CRC_IndoorAudit_ApprvlLtr - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Applicant: Center for Resource Conservation- Indoor Water Audit Program Date received: 12 -29 -09 Date reviewed: 4 -12 -10 HB 05 -1254: Evaluation checklist for Agencies For Agency Applicant: Yes No Comments: Is the applicant a public or private agency whose primary purpose is the x promotion of water resource conservation? Did the applicant provide a charter and/or have they defined their x operation principles? Did the applicant provide a written statement from the agency's x governing board, stating the agency's commitment to the project and the implementation of long -term water savings measures and programs (w /authorized signature)? Did the applicant provide a cover letter with the agency's: name, contact x information, and a signature of an individual with the authority to commit the resources of the agency? Did the agency state /identify who will be included in the education and x outreach efforts of the project? Description of Project: - - - -- - - - -- ------ - - - - -- Did the agency identify specific goals of the project? x Pg. 3 beginning of SOW Did the agency identify: their target audience(s) to reach, possible policy x Pg. l - 2 changes, and/or outcomes of educational efforts? (with respects to promoting the benefits of water resource conservation and water efficiency through education and outreach activities) Did the agency make a note of how the "goals" of their proposed project tie to the mission and objectives of the CWCB and its programs? Did the agency provide a detailed narrative (description) of specific tasks x Pg.2 -3 to be performed with grant monies (stating how grant money will be used to achieve project goals) Including ALL meetings, workshops, fairs, printings, mailings, etc.? *(a "scope of work" can combine this item with the timeline described below) Did the agency provide a "project" timeline, stating milestones with dates x PgA and end products with dates; also state the estimated dates when progress reports will be submitted to OWCDP staff (50% & 75% completion)? Did the applicant present a project budget overview, breaking down tasks x Pg.5 -6 by labor hours and costs also including all other direct costs such as travel per diem associated to the tasks? (Preferred in a schedule format Did the applicant provide a list of people and/or organizations that will be x Pg.7 -8 involved in assisting with the grant project (list of who will be utilizing the grant money)? Does the applicant demonstrate 25% matching funds? Listing all funding x Pg.6 -7 and spreadsheet sources to complete the "project"? In cash, in -kind services, or through payment of consulting fees or a combination thereof? Comments: