My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Drought & Water Management
CWCB
>
Drought Mitigation
>
DayForward
>
Drought & Water Management
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2010 3:24:05 PM
Creation date
4/29/2010 2:43:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Drought Mitigation
Title
What the Current Drought Means for the Future of Water Management in Colorado
Date
1/1/2003
Description
2002 Drought Impact Report
Basin
Statewide
Drought Mitigation - Doc Type
Reports
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Denver Water has prepared a Drought Response Plan to be used as a guide for identifying <br />and responding to drought conditions. For purposes of defining drought response <br />triggers, Denver uses projected reservoir storage levels as of July I". Denver's drought <br />plan is based upon three levels of drought severity and identifies demand reduction goals <br />associated with each drought level, as summarized below. <br />Denver's plan includes a "Menu of Possible Board Actions to Cut Water Use" for each of <br />the drought levels. The menu includes measures to temporarily increase water supplies, <br />reduce deliveries of water to contract customers outside the City and County of Denver, <br />education programs to increase public awareness and encourage voluntary conservation, <br />and mandatory water use restrictions. The board may select the combination of measures <br />it determines are necessary and appropriate to meet the applicable water use reduction <br />goal, given the circumstances at the time. <br />Denver Water initially projected that its reservoirs would reach at least 80% full by July <br />1 St , but subsequently reduced its projections and, in accordance with its drought response <br />plan, began mandatory watering restrictions by mid - summer, in spite of having generally <br />adequate reservoir supplies. Denver did have a problem with its North End system. The <br />North End pulls water from the Fraser and Williams Fork Rivers, both tributary to the <br />Colorado, through the Moffat Tunnel under the Continental Divide, to Gross Reservoir <br />on South Boulder Creek, a South Platte tributary. From the North End, Denver must <br />meet several raw water contract obligations, but there is far less storage than in the <br />remainder of the system. <br />In the south portion of its system, Denver Water transferred the contents of Antero <br />Reservoir to Cheesman Reservoir in order to reduce evaporation and help mitigate the <br />water quality effects of the Hayman Fire. The water is still there, but is more efficiently <br />used. <br />Denver Water adopted Stage 1 drought response measures on June 5, 2002 and asked all <br />customers to voluntarily reduce water use enough to achieve a 10% reduction in demand. <br />Due to the rapidly increasing severity of the drought, Denver then declared a Stage 2 <br />drought response on June 26, 2002 and imposed mandatory water use restrictions, <br />effective July 1, designed to achieve a system -wide demand reduction of 30 %. <br />During July and August 2002, the severity of the drought became more apparent, with <br />streams in some areas flowing at 10% of average and 30% to 50% less than the lowest <br />22 <br />Table IVA. Denver Water Drought Levels and Water Use Reduction Goals <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.