My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Drought & Water Management
CWCB
>
Drought Mitigation
>
DayForward
>
Drought & Water Management
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2010 3:24:05 PM
Creation date
4/29/2010 2:43:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Drought Mitigation
Title
What the Current Drought Means for the Future of Water Management in Colorado
Date
1/1/2003
Description
2002 Drought Impact Report
Basin
Statewide
Drought Mitigation - Doc Type
Reports
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
IV. Drought Responses of Major Water Management Systems <br />A. Background <br />Streamflows in Colorado during the year 2002 were the lowest in several centuries. <br />While water supply planners have been aware that extremely dry years like 2002 have <br />occurred in the past and will probably occur again, most major municipal water supply <br />systems are designed to withstand drought conditions that have occurred in recently <br />recorded history. In most parts of Colorado, flow measurements for major streams have <br />been recorded only over the last 50 to 100 years, and precipitation measurements over the <br />last 20 to 60 years. Most water providers have used the historical drought of 1954 -1956 <br />as the standard against which to design their systems. <br />Water supply planners have not adopted a universal definition of drought or common <br />design standards for water supply system reliability. The vulnerability of any particular <br />water supply system to shortages depends on many factors such as natural variations in <br />the geographic patterns of drought conditions, types of water supply sources (e.g. surface <br />water or groundwater), and types of water diversion and storage facilities. In many <br />instances, legal and institutional factors may be the primary determinant of system <br />reliability, whereas in other cases the actual availability of physical supply may be the <br />limiting factor in times of drought. <br />B. An Example of a Municipal Drought Management Plan: Denver Water <br />Denver Water operates the largest municipal water supply system in Colorado and has <br />adopted a conservative approach to planning for drought. Denver bases its estimate of <br />the amount of demand that can be reliably met on the firm yield of its system. The firm <br />yield is determined using a computer model to calculate the maximum amount of demand <br />that could be met during the driest period in a representative hydrologic study period, <br />1947 through 1991. Three consecutive dry years within that period, 1954 through 1956, <br />determine the firm yield of the Denver Water system. For the Denver system, water year <br />1954 yielded the least amount of supply of any year in the hydrologic study period. 1954 <br />was followed by two additional dry years during which the firm yield of the system is <br />limited by natural inflows to the system and the amount of water in storage reservoirs. <br />Recognizing the potential for droughts more severe than the 1954 -56 period and other <br />uncertainties, Denver Water utilizes additional measures to reduce the risk of water <br />supply shortages. In modeling the water supply system, Denver assumes that water <br />demands will be higher than average during periods of drought. The firm yield of <br />Denver's system is thus based upon an unrestricted demand, whereas during an actual <br />drought under Denver's Drought Response Plan (2002) water use restrictions would be <br />imposed to reduce demand. In addition, Denver Water reserves 30,000 acre -feet of its <br />firm yield as a safety factor to help insure the reliability of its system in the event of <br />severe drought and other risk factors. <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.