FLOODC00109 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

- 6- . Kent Wiley - When you raise the level 6 feet the impacts are high to the north boat ramps and marina. The riverside group picnic areas are lost at elevation 5438 and so are two group picnic shelters. At elevations, slightly higher than 5444 we lose the road. AT 5438 the major park functions are lost . Brad Piehl - spread the cost across more AF of water. Cost at 5444 for facilities, and where to put them, get a little more information about the recreation facilities to do this quickly Assumed Preble's habitat of plum creek and upper south platte, similar magnitude in rec and mouse habitat and mitigation. We will need to meet with the US Pish and Wildlife Service and discussion will include: buying land, conservation easements, mitigation. A 12 foot line and operational scenarios will influence things, once again combined with the water use study of those four uses. . Marc Waage - Leo's study was not that detailed and was the classic uses, agricultural, conjunctive use, etc. . Larry Lang - 5437 is where curves are going to break. We will take the most stable full pool from memorial to labor day. The worst scenario out the five and take it and use it for your costing. One good scenario is a stable pool during prime time . Paul Plack - The goaJ is to have Chatfield keep the recreation facilities the same. We need a one to one replacement. Chatfield needs to be run like a business. We can limit that season to the 90 days in the summer and longer boat ramps may be to ways to get the good and squeeze down the fluctuations, conjunctive use is more amenable to prime recreation time, a benefit may be more marshes like we taJked about in the morning. This study should be geared towards lower levels, giving us three alternatives, move marina up and down as long as the parking lot is good and adequate. . Kent Wiley - we may be able to do a swim beach, downstream below the dam. We may be able to create another gravel pond have made with the right slopes, enough real estate below the dam to do that. The big impacts are the environmental issues downstream. Previously we have talked about putting a swim beach below the dam with a water slide etc. There are no Preble's mouse below the dam. Good analysis of costs and topo will lead the decisions . Paul Plack - The Park will remain the same, at start of the study, think of this reservoir doing the same thing today as a bare bone minimum. Additional amenities like retractable bathrooms, etc. are selling points to the State Parks board. We can be creative and make the park better. . Kent Wiley - We are not spending money on public process right now. If we move 300 yards we will not need public input, plus getting dollar amount and the three design scenarios . Rick Miner - The cost of storage is replacing what you have got. Anything up and above should not be footed by water users . John Hendricks - We should consider dredging and going horizontal instead of vertical. This can compliment the study. Goes across the platte river by the road dredge it out 40 feet and may be some good gravel, they used to think when the reservoir area still have gravel . Rick Miner - maybe good idea but not in the scope of work . Bill Doan- the period of record 1939 - 1998 which was 60 years when the contract was put together and it could be expanded . Rick Miner - The budget study costs were increased a million dollars, $500,000 has to be cash and can't be in-kind, and we need $1 million in spendable cash. The CWCB will need to draft a letter and it needs soon to formulate a position. . Larry Lang - requested Rick miner at the CWCB meeting in September in Grand Junction Flood Protection. Water Project Planning and Finance. Stream and Lake Protection Water Supply Protection. Conservation Planning