My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOODC00109
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
FLOODC00109
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2010 10:12:21 AM
Creation date
9/30/2006 6:46:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Jefferson
Arapahoe
Basin
South Platte
Title
Chatfield Reallocation Study: Meeting Minutes 8/7/03
Date
8/7/2003
Prepared For
Jefferson County / Arapahoe County
Floodplain - Doc Type
Meeting Summary
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />-4- <br /> <br />. Rick Miner - We are developing a river model from Denver to Nebraska to the state line. The <br />modeling results will show flood stages all the way through Cobrado on the South Platte <br />River <br />. Brad Piehl- Recent flood impacts on the South Platte came from tributaries to the South <br />Platte downstream of Chatfield, the model will show this fact <br />. Larry Lang - the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District has nearly 100- year flood <br />control protection through the City of Denver <br />. Karen Sitoski - I recall that farms were flooded in Greeley in 1995 and they complained to <br />the Corps <br />. Rick Miner - These studies and work will give us what we need for an Environmental Impact <br />Statement and feasibility study in the final report <br />. Bill Doan - We have a decent reservoir operations model- using HEC 5 which is the <br />standard for the Corps and is based on historic conditions. Weare calibrating it for the flood <br />control. We calibrate by looking at upstream pool in wet years like 1980, 1983, 1995. We are <br />now incorporating the Brown and Caldwell Storage Use Patterns Investigation Study <br />information. Once we have existing conditions, then we look at impacts, upstream of the <br />pool, the downstream disclnrge, release frequencies and flow durations. It's a daily flow <br />model. The third impact is the Probable Maximum Flood. Using the 20,600 as conservation <br />pool we then put the standard project flood on top to see impacts. We are modeling all three <br />reservoirs as a system, release as quickly as possible, and account for incremental flows <br />between the reservoirs. To elaborate on calibration of the simplified model, the Corps has <br />developed rating curves. We are fine tuning the model <br />. John Hendricks - In the Brown and Caldwell study we didn't have a good opportunity to <br />show flexibility in terms of melding or optimizing operations with the conflicting interests <br />. Leo Eisel- A major problem, gave up on this aspect of the releases, We can see if the results <br />could be changed in uses and alleviate negative impacts <br />. Marc Waage - We put in ideal operating scenarios but it would be nice if we had a chance to <br />change them based on impacts to alleviate conflicts. Maybe we should build this into the <br />schedule, do another iteration trying to optimize things, have regularly scheduled meeting we <br />will have to work closely together, this is the initial input into the model <br />. Brad Piehl - There are currently six different alternatives and six different operating <br />scenarios, assuming we can gJ through a filtering process, move forward in the EIS need to <br />figure it out then carry decisions forward through the EIS <br />. Marc Waage - requested a line item in the Corps timeline that involves coordination <br />. Polly Deitz - wanted to know monitors the Corps and water users in the new deal <br />. Marc Waage - responded that the new operating scenarios will be part of the water control <br />manual that will be designed and the state engineer will record how the water is released <br />. Larry Lang - The state has a contract with the Corps for the existing 27,000 AF conservation <br />pool. The state may enter into contracts with the water users after the reallocation study for <br />the new storage space. The CWCB will hold public hearings to help make decisions about <br />the reallocation among the water users. The 1979 contract between the Corps and the state <br />has a nrovision that the state will conduct hearin"s on any future snace. The nrocedure has <br />already been put in place <br />. Rick Miner - The Corps is willing to put coordination with water users somewhere in the <br />schedule before September 2006 so that the water people know when its going to happen. <br />However, water discussions should be deferred for now because of what happened on the <br />Bear Creek Reservoir Reallocation Study. <br /> <br />Flood Protection. Water Project Planning and Finance. Stream and Lake Protection <br />Water Supply Protection. Conservation Planning <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.