Laserfiche WebLink
Repair of the ditch above Hi�hwav 24 <br />During the August 2009 tour, it was noted that the earthen ditch is quite close to an <br />embankment above Highway 24 and the material on the highway side of the ditch is <br />unstable. A repair to this area of the ditch is envisioned to be a suitable lining to <br />stabilized the ditch itself and prevent seepage from further destabilizing the earth <br />adjacent to the ditch. This repair is envisioned before the ditch is made operational in the <br />Spring of 2010. <br />Canal Lininq <br />Lining of the canal is considered to be an improvement that could provide significant <br />reduction of seepage and improve overall canal operations and delivery consistency to <br />shareholders. Final selection of the lining material for each reach to be piped will be <br />made during detailed design. <br />Phreatophvte Removal <br />The ditch has a number of areas of phreatophyte encroachment. In places, the ditch <br />rider must walk in the ditch just to inspect the ditch and pass through. Phased work is <br />envisioned to remove phreatophytes in a three year program. Canal reaches will be <br />identified, the removal work will be competitively bid, and work will be contracted with <br />one or more contractors. <br />Headqate Repair. Replacement, or New Installation <br />The Board and the superintendent have identified locations where old, unused <br />headgates will be removed. In other cases headgates need repair or new headgates and <br />flow measurement devices (flumes) must be installed. Budgetary probable costs for this <br />work have been developed but this will be affirmed after a standardized headgate and <br />flume arrangement has been developed. <br />Probable Construction Costs <br />Table 2 shows a summary of all of the prioritized capital improvements that have been <br />identified. The Board and the superintendent broke the various discrete cost elements of <br />the project into three rankings for priority — Year 1(highest priority), Year 2(moderate <br />priority), and Year 3(lower priority). If the complete package of improvements is <br />approved for a CWCB loan, then all of these improvements are envisioned to be <br />accomplished between the spring of 2010 and the spring of 2012 as is further described <br />in the next section. <br />Year 1(highest priority) improvements total $153,400, Year 2(moderate priority) <br />improvements total $32,200, and the Year 3(lower priority) improvements total $12,000 <br />for a grand total of $204,600. A loan request is made to CWCB in the amount of 90% of <br />$204,600 or $184,140. <br />Aqua Engineering, Inc. Riverside Ditch � Allen Extension Co., Feasibility Study <br />October 2009 - 6 - <br />