Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Page 10 <br /> <br />minimum flows in mainchannel and larger tributary environments for the benefit of endangered fish <br />could lead to greater use of tributary waters in the future to make up for reductions in mainstem <br />diversions, thus potentially jeopardizing persistence of the three species. Additional endangered <br />species recovery programs throughout the range of the three species are implementing activities that <br />will likely indirectly benefit the three species; please reference the state plans of Arizona, Colorado, <br />Nevada, New Mexico, and Wyoming for this information. <br /> <br />Benefits of the three species project <br /> <br />Conservation of the three species will likely require habitat protection, water acquisition, and <br />management of nonnative fish communities. Together, these conservation actions will also benefit <br />the general public as a whole as conservation is directed towards maintenance of functionally healthy <br />riparian ecosystems and prevention of listing under the Endangered Species Act. Fischer et aI. (2000) <br />cite multiple beneficial ecosystem functions resulting from healthy, functional riparian areas, <br />including improved water quality, erosion control, and reduced flood peaks (O'Laughlin and Belt <br />1995), all of which have been shown to provide substantial benefit~ to human populations. <br />Additionally, keeping regulatory authority in the hands of state, county, and local governments <br />through the prevention of federal listing will ensure that conservation efforts can proceed more <br />fluidly without economic hardship or conflict that may accompany regulatory protection of species. <br />Voluntary cooperation between stakeholders and managers is thought to be more likely to occur in <br />this atmosphere than in the more restrictive scenario engendered by listing. <br /> <br />Certainty of Implementation: Staffing, Authority, and Funding <br /> <br />Pursuant to the federal Policy for Evaluation of Conservation Efforts (PECE) guidelines, the Division <br />acknowledges the need to demonstrate a degree of certainty that this Plan will be implemented and <br />will be effective in preventing the need for listing the three species. <br /> <br />Staffing <br />Personnel from the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources' (Division) Native Aquatics Program will <br />implement aspects of this Plan. Within the Division, three full time employees are tasked with <br />various types of administrative three species tasks such as procuring funding, planning conservation <br />activities in coordination with regional offices, completing conservation documents and proposals <br />with input from regional offices, and performing other administrative duties necessary to implement <br />the Plan. Regional and Division field offices are located in St. George, Moab, Ogden, Price, and <br />VemaI. These offices include at least one and as many as three full time employees charged with <br />developing work plans for implementing this Plan. Funds are regularly made available for seasonal <br />help to complete fieldwork. <br /> <br />Authority <br />Some cooperative opportunities with other agencies that hold management responsibilities for the <br />land and water immediately surrounding these species' habitats have been established; others are <br />being pursued at this time. These core managers are currently meeting at least twice a year, once to <br />discuss range-wide priorities and once to discuss statewide priorities. These agencies are committed <br />to providing consistent representation to this "Three Species Conservation Team" (Team) and to <br />working towards conservation of these three species and have the authority to do so as outlined in <br />Appendix B. In the future, as more specific conservation and management actions are identified and <br />