My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9713
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9713
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:58 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 5:14:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9713
Author
VanHaverbeke, D.R.
Title
Stock assessment and fisheries monitoring activities in the Little Colorado River within Grand Canyon during 2004.
USFW Year
2005.
USFW - Doc Type
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />auxiliary mark to the newly PIT tagged fish ~ 150 mm (Van Haverbeke and <br />Coggins 2002). Unfortunately, this type of auxiliary mark was found to be <br />unreliable as a diagnostic tool, because some marked fins regenerated and were <br />unidentifiable, and some fins thought to have been marked (punched) were never <br />in fact marked. Our experience with elastomer dye tags thus far has shown that <br />they are too unreliable to use as a long term secondary mark (Stone and <br />Sponholtz 2003). However, there may be potential for using elastomer dye to <br />test for short term loss of PIT tags (i.e., tags that are lost before the wound <br />heals). It was assumed during these studies that tag loss was probably <br />negligible, but concluded that future investigation might be warranted (i.e., other <br />type of secondary marking might be investigated). <br /> <br />The fifth assumption relates to the ability of field personnel to detect the <br />presence of a tag in a fish. This assumption was not evaluated directly; however, <br />our staff is trained in the proper operation of the PIT scanners and is exceedingly <br />careful to ensure that PIT scanners are in good working order. <br /> <br />Abundance estimates were calculated with the formulae presented by Seber <br />(1982) as: <br /> <br />NO = (M+IXC+l)_1 (1) <br />R+l ' <br /> <br />V[NO]= (M +lXC+IXM -RXC-R) (2) <br />(R+lY(R+2) , <br /> <br />Where NO, is the estimated number of fish in the population, V[NO] is the <br />estimated variance of the number of fish in the population, M is the number of <br />fish marked during the marking events (April and September trips), G is the <br />number of fish captured during the recapture events (May and October trips), and <br />R is the number of fish recaptured from the marked population during the <br />recapture events. The 95% confidence limits on our abundance estimates <br />assume a normal distribution and are appropriate given the ratios of RIG and <br />RIM observed (Seber 1982). <br /> <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.