Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Table A2. Continued. <br /> <br />General Flow and Temperature Relevant Studies <br />Recommendations Anticipated Effects and Uncertainties (Hypotheses) (primary studies in bold) <br />(Muth et al. 2000) <br />Reach 1-8ummer Through Winter Base <br />The mean flow for the summer-winter Anticipated Effects <br />period should be established each year A3. Target water temperatures in Lodore Canyon are expected to A3-1. Project 8 <br />on the basis of anticipated hydrologic be achieved in 7 of 10 years (average and drier years) and could A3-2. Project 19 <br />conditions, but adjustments can be result in Colorado pikeminnow spawning in this portion ofthe A3-3. Project 115 <br />made if hydrologic conditions change. river (Muth et al. 2000). A3-4. Reclamation Program Management <br />Releases from the dam should (Proiect 1). <br />gradually decline from peak flow to A4. More favorable water temperatures also could result in A4-1. Project 115 <br />base flow, with the base flow reached expansion of humpback chubs into this portion of the river (Muth <br />by early to middle summer et al. 2000). <br />(depending on hydrologic conditions) Uncertainties <br />and maintained through February. U3. If warmer water (160C) could be released at the dam during U3-1. Project 8 <br /> wetter years, recommended temperature targets could be achieved U3-2. Project 19 <br /> in more frequently (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2005). U3-3. Project 115 <br /> U3-4. Reclamation Program Management <br /> (project 1). <br /> U4. The effect of base flows and release temperatures on U4-1. Project 115 <br /> nonnative fish populations (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2005). U4-2. Project 110 <br /> U4-3. Project 123 <br /> U4-4. Project 125 <br /> U4-5. Projects C-18/19 <br /> <br />~ <br />~ <br />~ <br />~ <br />~ <br />V:l <br />...., <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />:> <br />I <br />- <br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br />()- <br />..., <br />;:: <br />~ <br /> <br />.~ <br />~ <br />c <br />C <br />"-l <br />