Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Table A2. Matrix of flow and temperature recommendations, hypotheses, and relevant studies for Reach 1 (Flaming Gorge Dam to <br />Yampa River confluence) of the Green River. Language for anticipated effects and uncertainties was taken from Muth et al. (2000), <br />U.S. Department of the Interior and Western Area Power Administration (2005), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (2005), or U.S. <br />Department of the Interior (2006). See Table A4 for details of specific studies. Primary studies (bold) and supporting studies are <br />linked to Anticipated Effects (A) or Uncertainties (U) and ordered sequentially. <br /> <br />General Flow and Temperature Relevant Studies <br />Recommendations Anticipated Effects and Uncertainties (Hypotheses) (primary studies in bold) <br />(Muth et al. 2000) <br />Reach I-Spring Peak <br />Peak flows in Reach 1 should be of Anticipated Effects <br />the magnitude, timing, and duration to AI. Significant channel maintenance (i.e., rework and rebuild in- AI-I. USU channel monitoring studies <br />achieve recommended peak flows in channel sediment deposits, increase habitat complexity, and <br />Reaches 2 and 3. In wetter years, peak prevent or reverse channel narrowing) in Lodore Canyon in wet <br />flows should be of sufficient years or in other years when peak releases are greater than 244 <br />magnitude to restore and rebuild m3/s (8,600 cfs) (Muth et al. 2000). <br />habitats currently occupied by adult A2. Channel maintenance will improve habitat conditions for A2-I. Project 115. <br />Colorado pikeminnow in Lodore endangered fishes and could favor potential spawning of <br />Canyon. No upper limits are placed on Colorado pikeminnow in this portion of the river (Muth et al. <br />recommended peak-flow releases in 2000). <br />any hydrologic condition. Uncertainties <br /> UI. The increased frequency of bypassing water (spills) would UI-I. Project 115 <br /> result in increased entrainment of reservoir nonnative species. UI-2. UDWR tailwater fisheries studies <br /> Reach 1 monitoring should include specific efforts to evaluate the UI-3. Projects C-18/19 <br /> potential for establishing undesirable reservoir fishes, such as UI-4. Project 119 <br /> smallmouth bass in the tailwater (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service <br /> 2005). <br /> U2. The response of nonnative fish populations to spring peak U2-1. Project 115 <br /> flows (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2005). U2-2. Projects C-18/19 <br /> U2-3. Project 110 <br /> U2-4. Project 109 <br /> U2-5. Project 98a <br /> U2-6. Project 98b <br /> U2-7. Project 123 <br /> U2-8. Project 125 <br /> U2-9. Project 140 <br /> <br />~ <br />~ <br />~ <br />~ <br />~ <br />V:l <br />"-'l <br />6 <br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />> <br />I <br />...... <br />W <br /> <br />~ <br />l::J- <br />... <br />l:: <br />tl <br />~ <br />,t-..> <br />t-..> <br />o <br />o <br />'-l <br />