Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Preliminary Testing of the Role of Exercise and Predator <br />Recognition for Bonytail and Razorback Sucker <br /> <br />By Gordon A. Mueller and Jeanette Carpenter, U.S. Geological Survey, and Robert Krapfel and <br />Chester Figiel, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service <br /> <br />Summary <br />Hatchery-reared juvenile, <25-cm TL (total1ength), razorback suckers appeared curious and <br />showed no sign of predator avoidance when initially placed with large (>45-cm TL) flathead catfish. <br />Predator-naIve juveniles (20- to 25-cm TL) exhibited no discernable preference when provided areas <br />with and without (52 percent and 48 percent, n = 16 observations; 46 percent and 54 percent, n = 20 <br />observations) large flathead catfish. However, once predation occurred, use of predator-free areas nearly <br />doubled in two trials (36 percent and 64 percent, n = 50 observations; 33 percent and 67 percent, n = 12 <br />observations). A more stringent test examining available area indicated predator-savvy razorback <br />suckers used predator-free areas (88 percent, n = 21) illustrating predator avoidance was a learned <br />behavior. <br />Razorback suckers exercised (treatment) in water current (<0.3 mls) for 10 weeks exhibited <br />greater swimming stamina than unexercised, control fish. When exercised and unexercised razorback <br />suckers were placed together with large predators in 2006, treatment fish had significantly fewer (n = 9, <br />z = 1.69, P = 0.046) mortalities than control fish, suggesting increased stamina improved predator <br />escape skills. Predator/prey tests comparing razorback suckers that had been previously exposed to a <br />predation event with control fish, found treatment fish also had significantly fewer losses than predator- <br />naiVe fish (p = 0.017). Similar tests exposing predator-savvy and predator-naIve bony tail with <br />largemouth bass showed a similar trend; predator-savvy bony tail suffered 38 percent fewer losses than <br />control fish. However, there was not a statistically significant difference between the test groups (p = <br />0.143) due to small sample size. All exercise and predator exposure trials increased the survival rate of <br />razorback sucker and bony tail compared to untreated counterparts. <br /> <br />Introduction <br />Historically, fish culturists have based production on the most economical method of raising <br />large numbers of fish. In other words, the most fish for the fewest dollars. Traditionally, survival has not <br />been an issue with recreational species, which are typically stocked to augment depleted communities. <br />However, in endangered repatriation programs, fish are not only being stocked into altered habitats, but <br />ones that are already at full carrying capacity. Natives not only have to avoid predation, but also have to <br />out-compete resident fishes for food and space. The practice of mass stockings to augment imperiled <br />fishes has proved problematic worldwide (Philipp art, 1995). <br />Since 1980, more than two-million bony tail (Gila elegans) and 15-million razorback sucker <br />(Xyrauchen texanus) have been reintroduced into the Colorado River basin (unpublished data, U.S. Fish <br />and Wildlife Service, Dexter National Fish Hatchery). Unfortunately, survival has been extremely low <br />(< 1 0,000), if not totally absent (Marsh and others, 2005). Marsh and Brooks (1989) reported that entire <br />truck loads of hatchery razorback suckers were eaten by resident catfish within hours of release. Recent <br />