My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9698
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
9698
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:28:20 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 5:10:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9698
Author
Borley, K., and M.M. White.
Title
Mitochondrial DNA variation in the endangered Colorado pikeminnow
USFW Year
2006.
USFW - Doc Type
a comparison among hatchery stocks and historic specimens.
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br /> <br />DNA VARIATION IN COLORADO PIKE MINNOW <br /> <br />ltion observed <br />ltchery brood- <br />ill number of <br />tic diversity is <br />,ulations when <br />II (Vrijenhoek <br />JW has under- <br />size and range <br />decline would <br />1. <br />~gests that low <br />m decline and <br />ninnow in the <br />en subjected to <br />00 years ago <br />ght is thought <br />faunas, whose <br />ies (Matthews <br />hypothesis that <br />~rm impacts on <br />concluded that <br />e flannelmouth <br />::olorado River <br />ought scenario. <br />lpid population <br />e end of the <br />: affected the <br />Jacted genetic <br />other Colorado <br />attributed low <br />Gila elegans to <br />10 evidence of <br />J G. cypha or <br /> <br />TABLE 3.-Primers used to amplify and sequence the ND-4 <br />and ND-4-L gene regions in museum samples of Colorado <br />pikeminnow and three year-classes of Colorado pikeminnow <br />maintained at Dexter National Fish Hatchery and Technology <br />Center, New Mexico. <br /> <br />Primer name <br /> <br />Sequence <br /> <br />ArgBL <br />ND4LH <br />ND4LB(L) <br />NAP2(H) <br /> <br />5'-CAAGACCCTTGA TTTCGGCTCA-3' <br />5' -TCTGTCGCT AGGT A T AGA TT-3' <br />5~CAAAACCTTAATCTYCTACAATGCT~' <br />5' - TGGAGCTTCT AC G TG RGC TTT -3' <br /> <br />1989; Morizot et al. 2002). Three of these alleles were <br />found in wild Green River fish, and four were found in <br />the upper Colorado River. It is possible that other <br />basin-specific mtDNA haplotypes are not present in the <br />hatchery strains because of the small number of <br />founders. However, the observation that the hatchery <br />stock exhibiting variation was founded from fish <br />obtained from two different rivers (Green and Colo- <br />rado) suggests that there may be additional haplotypes <br />present in the wild. <br />Low mtDNA variation in DNFHTC Colorado pike- <br />minnow is attributable to an apparently low level of <br />such variation in the wild source populations, mode of <br />mtDNA inheritance, and small founding sizes of the <br />captive populations. Due to its maternal mode of <br />inheritance, mtDNA is more prone to bottlenecks than <br />nuclear DNA. The effective population size for <br />mtDNA is one-fourth of the autosomal effective <br />population size (Ballard and Whitlock 2004), making <br />mtDNA more susceptible to genetic drift. The <br />maximum number of mtDNA haplotypes that will be <br />present in a hatchery strain is equal to the. number of <br />females included in the original broodstock. The 81 YC <br />stock was created using three females (Morizot et al. <br />2002). The sex ratio of 74YC founders is unknown <br />(Morizot et al. 2002). The 91YC stock was founded <br />with five females (J. H. Williamson, DNFHTC, <br />personal communication). <br /> <br />lrone to genetic <br />;175). Previous <br />:minnow found <br />n and Morizot <br /> <br />'ado pikeminnow <br />logy Center, New <br />mia Academy of <br /> <br />Management Recommendations <br /> <br />Genetic management of the Colorado pikeminnow <br />should focus on preserving the existing levels of <br />variation. Morizot et al. (2002) suggested the mainte- <br />nance of three hatchery stocks derived from the <br />Yampa, Green, and Colorado rivers. They proposed <br />using hatchery-raised individuals derived from 74YC <br />for the Yampa River strain along with periodic <br />incorporation of wild fish. The Green and Colorado <br />River broodstocks would be established from 20 <br />(Green River) to 50 (Colorado River) wild individuals. <br />Additional wild individuals would be introduced <br />periodically. Inclusion of wild individuals would <br /> <br />Iaplotype <br /> <br />A <br />A <br />A <br />A <br />A <br />A <br />A <br />A <br />A <br />A <br />A <br /> <br /> <br />919 <br /> <br />increase the effective population size of the founder <br />populations (Hedrick et al. 2000). <br />An alternative would be to maintain a single hatchery <br />strain for basinwide stocking. The mtDNA data support <br />the presence of only a single ESU. There have been <br />numerous interbasin stockings (e.g., Yampa 74YC to <br />Colorado River, Yampa 74YC to White River, and <br />Green-Colorado 81YC to San Juan River) that would <br />tend to homogenize allele and haplotype frequencies <br />throughout the drainage, creating a single MU. Crist and <br />Ryden (2003) suggested that the size of the wild San <br />Juan River stock would preclude establishment of a San <br />Juan River broodstock and recommended using the <br />nearest available broodstock, probably either the Green <br />or Colorado River stock, to supplement. Combining the <br />broodstocks would have the advantage of more cost- <br />efficient maintenance and would maximize the available <br />variation. However, the absence of variation among the <br />stocks should not necessarily be used as justification for <br />homogenization of stocks (Crandall et al. 2000). <br />Carefully designed breeding schemes, establishment of <br />multiple populations in separate facilities, and augmen- <br />tation of the stock with wild-caught individuals would <br />be critical for the success of this strategy. <br />The choice of Jnanagement strategy depends on <br />whether the past. stockings have resulted in adults <br />displaying normal behavior and successful reproduc- <br />tion. There is site fidelity, both to the spawning areas <br />and to the postspawning home ranges (Tyus 1985, <br />1986; Osmundson et al. 1998). Age-O Colorado <br />pikeminnow are known to drift downstream and have <br />been observed at high densities below the confluence of <br />the Green and Colorado rivers (USFWS 2002), where <br />population mixing could occur (Tyus 1990). However, <br />Irving and Modde (2000) suggested that hatchery fish <br />do not exhibit typical wild fish behavior. If these fish <br />do not exhibit normal movements, it would complicate <br />management (Tyus 1991), alter existing patterns of <br />gene flow, and probably delay recovery of the Colorado <br />pikeminnow. Additional studies of the hatchery and <br />wild populations with more rapidly evolviTIg markers <br />(i.e., mtDNA control region and microsatellites) might <br />allow greater resolution of the patterns of variation and <br />clarify future hatchery management strategies. <br /> <br />Acknowledgments <br /> <br />We would like to thank the following individuals for <br />their help in obtaining specimens: G. Carmichael, J. H. <br />Williamson, C. Keeler, A. Fuller, and M. Ulibarri <br />(USFWS) and D. Morizot (University of Texas). This <br />manuscript was significantly improved by comments <br />from G. Carmichael, J. H. Williamson, J. Faber, and <br />two anonymous reviewers. Laboratory facilities and <br />expertise during the initial stages of this project were <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.