My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9697
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
9697
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:28:20 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 5:10:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9697
Author
Bestgen, K.R., D.W. Beyers, J.A. Rice and G.B. Haines.
Title
Factors affecting recruitment of young Colorado pikeminnow
USFW Year
2006.
USFW - Doc Type
synthesis of predation experiments, field studies, and individual-based modeling.
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />1736 <br /> <br />0.35 <br />C 0.3 <br />ai 0.25 <br />5- 0.2 <br />J: 0.15 <br />0.1 <br />0.05 <br />o <br /> <br />o No predation . With predation <br /> <br /> <br />0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 <br />Growth rate (mm TUd) <br /> <br />FIGURE 1O.-Frequency distributions (means of five <br />simulations) of growth rates of Colorado pikeminnow larvae <br />in the Green River, Utah, with and without size-dependent <br />predation by red shiners, as derived by an individual-based <br />recmitment model. Individuals in both cohorts were assigned <br />a growth rate by random draw from an initial distribution of <br />growth rates that had a mean of 0.4 rnrn/d (SD = 0.07). <br /> <br />in both simulations and the field, except for the middle <br />Green River field data in 1991. <br />The mean TLs of Colorado pikeminnow from field <br />data and ffiM simulations were generally similar across <br />river reaches and years (Table 1; Figure II). The <br />largest discrepancy was for the middle Green River, <br />1991, where mean length of Colorado pikeminnow <br />juveniles in autumn was 4.9 mm greater than predicted <br />from simulations. The ffiM simulations did not predict <br />the mode of late-hatching and relatively small <br />Colorado pikeminnow observed in field samples, but <br />simulated and field-collected fish had identical mean <br />11... Generally, length distributions were broader for <br />wild fish than for simulations, probably a result of <br />conservative estimates of the SD of growth rates used <br />in simulations. <br /> <br />Discussion <br />We used experiments, field observations, and <br />simulation modeling to produce a relatively compre- <br />hensive assessment of factors affecting recruitment of <br />early life stages of {;:olorado pikeminnow. Small-scale <br />laboratory experiments provided the basis for under- <br />standing a precise mechanism, size-dependent preda- <br />tion by red shiners on early life stages of Colorado <br />pikemirmow and allowed estimation of effects of <br />relevant field variables, such as turbidity and alterna- <br />tive prey, on predation. Field studies in the Green River <br />provided scale-appropriate observations of the entire <br />recruitment process for early life stages of Colorado <br />pikemirmow, including observations of timing and <br />intensity of spawning, effects of stochastic flow events, <br />and patterns of intra-armual variation in recruitment <br />and growth that were correlated with important but <br />uncontrolled envirornmental variables. Congruence of <br />recruitment hypotheses generated from laboratory <br /> <br />BESTGEN ET AL. <br /> <br /> 0.4 <br /> 0.3 <br /> 0.2 <br /> 0.1 <br /> 0 <br /> ....<:> ....":> ....":> <br /> <;:s' <;:so.; '!If"; <br /> ".; 'V ":l <br /> 0.3 <br /> 0.25 <br /> 0.2 <br /> 0.15 <br /> 0.1 <br /> 0.05 <br />s::: 0 <br />0 ....<:> ....":> ....0.> <br />...... <br />t:: <;:s' <;:s"J '!If"; <br />0 ".; 'V ":l <br />0.. <br />0 <br />.... <br />0.... 0.35 <br /> 0.3 <br /> 0.25 <br /> 0.2 <br /> 0.15 <br /> 0.1 <br /> 0.05 <br /> 0 <br /> ....":> ....0.> ...."" <br /> <;:s' <;:so.; ,,? <br /> ".; 'V ":l <br /> 0.4 <br /> 0.3 <br /> <br />MGR 1991 <br /> <br /> <br />....<:> <br />'!If'" <br />" <br /> <br />....<:> <br />'!If'O <br />" <br /> <br />....":> <br /><;:sl>. <br />1>; <br /> <br />LGR 1991 <br /> <br /> <br />....0.> <br />'!If'" <br />" <br /> <br />....<:> <br />'!If'O <br />" <br /> <br />....0, <br />~'" <br /> <br />MGR 1992 <br /> <br /> <br />........<:> <br /><::7f <br />1>; <br /> <br />....<:> <br />'!If'" <br /><-;; <br /> <br />....<:> <br />'!If'O <br /><0 <br /> <br />LGR 1992 <br /> <br />0.2 <br /> <br />0.1 <br /> <br />o <br />....0, <br />,<::7f' <br /> <br /> <br />.,....0.> <br /><::7f <br /><-;; <br /> <br />....0, <br />'!If'O <br /><0 <br /> <br />....0, <br /><::7f'V <br />'V <br /> <br />....0, <br /><::7f"j <br />":l <br /> <br />....0, <br />1>.' <br /><::7f <br />1>; <br /> <br />Colorado pikeminnow TL (mm) <br /> <br />FiGURE 1 L-Size-distributions of age-O Colorado pike- <br />minnow captured in autumn in the middle (MGR) and lower <br />Green River (LGR), Utah, in 1991 and 1992 (black ban;) <br />compared with individual-based recruitment model simula- <br />tions (white ban;) that used drift-net captures of larvae as <br />cohort inputs. <br /> <br />experiments and field data were evaluated with a <br />model. The data-driven ffiM we developed integrated <br />numerous interacting factors, including seasonally <br />varying water temperature and predator-size dynamics, <br />and allowed evaluation of importance of those specific <br />mechanisms to the recruitment process that would not <br />be obvious from results of laboratory experiments or <br />field observations alone. The ffiM simulations pro- <br />duced predictions that were generally consistent with <br />field observations, even though we only considered <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.