Laserfiche WebLink
<br />YOUNG COLORADO PIKEMINNOW RECRUITMENT <br /> <br />co '!~ <br />:> <br />.~ <br />:: l <br />(/) <br />* co <br /> :> <br /> .~ <br /> ::l <br /> '" <br /> :;: <br /> 0 <br /> 45 B c: <br /> -Warm -Cool c: <br />s- '6 <br />40 Q) <br />g -'<: <br /> 's.. <br />.....:l 35 0 <br />E-< ~ <br />co 30 ~ <br />c: 0 <br />~ "0 <br />25 u <br /> 20 <br /> Hun lI-Jun 21-Jun I-Jul lI-Jo1 21-Jul 31- Jul <br /> Hatching date <br /> <br /> <br />FIGURE 8.-Simulated effects of cool and warm thermal <br />regimes and hatching date on (A) swvival and (B) final toIal <br />length (TI..) of Colorado pikeminnow larvae that hatched from <br />1 Iune to 1 August in the Green River, Utah. Simulations <br />ended 1 October, and predator density was 6 red shiners/m2. <br /> <br />Colorado pikeminnow length at the end of the <br />growing season was strongly affected by hatching date <br />(Figure 8B). In both of the warm and cool thermal <br />regimes, early hatching larvae reached almost twice the <br />size of late hatching ones because they had more time <br />to grow. Total lengths in simulations with the warm <br />thermal regime were 12-26% larger than those of fish <br />with the cool thennal regime. Changes in length of <br />Colorado pikeminnow over time showed that larvae <br />hatched in June became invulnerable to red shiner <br />predation by late July, whereas fish that hatched in late <br />July were still small enough for large red shiners to <br />consume at the end of the season. <br />Effect of predator density.-Predator density had a <br />strong effect on the survival of larvae with a 1 July <br />hatching date in both cool and warm thermal regimes. <br />Survival in both cool and warm thermal regimes was <br />over 50% at a red shiner density of 1 fish/m2 but 10% <br />or less at a density of 6 fish/m2 (Figure 9A). The <br />curvilinear response was due to the rate of change in <br />the number of anacks and capture rates of larvae (from <br />equation 3) as predator density increased. Water <br />temperature had a strong effect.; at the highest predator <br />density about twice as many larvae survived !he <br />simulation period in warm water temperatures com- <br />pared to cold. <br />Effect of growth rate of larvae.-In simulations, the <br />mean growth rate of Colorado pikeminnow larvae had <br />a large and positive effect on survival (Figure 9B). <br /> <br />1735 <br /> <br />I~ <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />12345 6 <br />Red shiner density/m2 <br /> <br />60 <br />50 <br />40 <br />30 <br />20 <br />10 <br />o <br />0.2 <br /> <br />B <br /> <br />........ Wann -0- Cool <br /> <br /> <br />Q3 Q4 Q5 <br />Baseline growth rate (mm TLld) <br /> <br />0.6 <br /> <br />FIGURE 9.-Simulated effects of (A) red shiner predator <br />density and (B) Colorado pikeminnow baseline growth rate on <br />swvival .of age-O cohorts of pikeminnow larvae in the Green <br />River, Utah, using warm and cool thermal regimes. Coloni- <br />zation date was 1 Iuly. <br /> <br />Those growth rates, 0.2 to 0.6 mm/d TL, reflected the <br />range we found for the wild age-O Colorado pike- <br />minnow (0.15--O.65-mm/d TL). Survival was relatively <br />high (40-50%) in cold and warm scenarios at the <br />highest mean growth rate but less than 10% at the <br />lowest mean growth rate. Water temperature had a <br />substantial effect, especially at the lowest growth rate, <br />where about twice as many larvae survived the <br />simulated period in warm conditions. <br />Selection for fast growers.-In all simulations, <br />growth rate varied atnong individual fish as it does in <br />natural populations. Similar to growth rates observed in <br />field studies, the simulated growth rates of Colorado <br />pikeminnow that survived to the end of the growing <br />season shifted to fish with faster growth rates compared <br />with !he initial distribution (Figure 10). This was <br />because size-selective predation by red shiners tended <br />to remove the smaller individuals with relatively low <br />growth rates faster than fish with higher growth rates. <br />Comparison of model and field patterns.-Predic- <br />tions of cohort relative survival from mM simulations <br />were similar to those observed for wild Colorado <br />pikeminnow (Figure 6). Relative survival indices <br />calculated for wild fish from the first arumal cohort <br />and for those simulated were I or less and were lower <br />than relative survival indices in second, !hird, and <br />fourth cohorts (Table 1). Similarly, relative survival <br />indices were usually highest for fish in the last cohorts <br />