My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9549
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9549
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:58 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 5:03:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9549
Author
Bestgen, K. R., K. A. Zelasko, R. I. Compton and T. Chart.
Title
Response of the Green River Fish Community to Changes in Flow Temperature Regimes from Flaming Gorge Dam since 1996 based on sampling conducted from 2002 to 2004.
USFW Year
2006.
USFW - Doc Type
115,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
featured, small, and delicate head and mouth, a slightly overhung snout and subterminal mouth, a <br />small nuchal hump, and a slender body and caudal peduncle. The line extending backwards <br />from the angle of the anal fin passed just over or in front of the upper lobe of the caudal <br />peduncle. Body coloration was typically silvery. Dorsal/anal fin ray counts were usually 9/9 (N <br />= 5), but 8/10 (N = 1), 9/10 (N = 1), and 10/10 (N = 1) were also observed. <br />In comparison, roundtail chub had stouter overall features, including a larger head, a <br />terminal mouth, no nuchal hump, and a more robust body and caudal peduncle. A few roundtail <br />chub > 350 mm TL possessed slightly raised nuchal humps, but the other features just discussed <br />were used to differentiate humpback from roundtail chub. The line extending backwards from <br />the angle of the anal fin passed through the upper lobe of the caudal peduncle. Body coloration <br />was silvery but often darker, especially dorsally. <br />All humpback chubs collected were from the steep-walled upper portion of Whirlpool <br />Canyon in a 1.8-km-long reach beginning at RK 551.8. One additional humpback chub was <br />collected by angling in 2003 in the same reach; it was released before it was tagged. All <br />humpback chub captured were from deep pools or recirculating eddies associated with an <br />upstream riffle, and were typically captured in nets set downstream of large boulders that <br />produced areas with relatively low current velocity. Humpback chub was nearly always <br />captured with roundtail chub and often in the same net set. In autumn 2004, we captured <br />humpback chub, roundtail chub, and bonytail from the same eddy in upper Whirlpool Canyon, <br />which is likely the first such record in many years. <br />We captured humpback chub individuals in each year of the study: two in 2002, four in <br />2003, and two in 2004. One fish first marked on 6 October 2003 at RK 55 1.8 was recaptured <br />there on 13 October 2003, and then again on 28 July 2004. That fish increased in length from <br />263 mm TL in 2003 to 297 mm TL in 2004 (34 mm change) and gained 76 grams (136 in 2003 <br />to 212 in 2004) over the capture interval. Another humpback chub captured on 7 October 2003 <br />was recaptured by the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (S. Finney, pers. comm.) on 29 <br />October 2003 in the same location. Another humpback chub first marked on 23 September 2004 <br />at RK 550.5 was recaptured 0.4 RK upstream in Whirlpool Canyon on 14 September 2005. That <br />54
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.