My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9549
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9549
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:58 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 5:03:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9549
Author
Bestgen, K. R., K. A. Zelasko, R. I. Compton and T. Chart.
Title
Response of the Green River Fish Community to Changes in Flow Temperature Regimes from Flaming Gorge Dam since 1996 based on sampling conducted from 2002 to 2004.
USFW Year
2006.
USFW - Doc Type
115,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
We do not know to what degree roundtail chub abundance estimate assumptions were <br />met. We do not expect recruitment or tag loss during the period. Some fish were moving within <br />the study in the relatively short time period encompassed by the three-pass sampling, but we do <br />not know how this might have affected estimates. Broader spatial sampling was needed to <br />determine if movement of tagged fish out of the study reach and movement of untagged fish into <br />the study reach biased abundance estimates. Most fish we released were in relatively good <br />condition, and the high recapture rate for the few humpback chub captured (3 of 8, see below) <br />suggested high survival of marked animals during our sampling. Longer-term mortality from <br />tagging effects may merit more attention, given other investigators' concerns over handling <br />mortality (pers. comm., C. McAda, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Grand Junction). <br />Nevertheless, estimated abundance of roundtail chubs in Whirlpool Canyon may offer some <br />benchmark for future comparisons. <br />The wider range of roundtail chub size classes present in Whirlpool Canyon compared to <br />Lodore indicated a more stable population with some recruitment. The Whirlpool Canyon reach <br />doubtless gets some addition of young from upstream reaches because young chubs are present <br />in drift samples collected in summer in the lower Yampa River (Bestgen et al. 1998). Near <br />absence of certain predators such as abundant brown trout may contribute to the relative success <br />of roundtail chubs in Whirlpool Canyon. Salmonids are significant predators on humpback <br />chubs in the Colorado River, Grand Canyon (Marsh and Douglas 1997). Smallmouth bass and <br />channel catfish are also potential predators in both Lodore and Whirlpool canyons. Continued <br />population monitoring may be needed to reveal whether the Whirlpool Canyon population of <br />roundtail chub is stable. <br />Humpback chub.-A total of eight humpback chub were collected during sampling <br />conducted from 2002 to 2004. Humpback chub in Whirlpool Canyon were not the classic deep- <br />bodied form found in Colorado River in places such as Black Rocks, Westwater, and Grand <br />canyons. Rather, they conformed to the humpback chub morphotype found in the rest of the <br />Green River Basin in Desolation-Gray canyons of the Green River, Yampa Canyon of the <br />Yampa River, and the Little Snake River (Fig. 45). They were typified by a relatively fine- <br />53
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.