My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9549
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9549
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:58 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 5:03:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9549
Author
Bestgen, K. R., K. A. Zelasko, R. I. Compton and T. Chart.
Title
Response of the Green River Fish Community to Changes in Flow Temperature Regimes from Flaming Gorge Dam since 1996 based on sampling conducted from 2002 to 2004.
USFW Year
2006.
USFW - Doc Type
115,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />average (30 to 70% exceedance), moderately wet (10-30% exceedance), and wet (0-10% <br />exceedance). Flaming Gorge Dam spring peak release recommendations range from 130 m3/s <br />(full power-plant capacity) in dry years to > 244 m'/s in wet years. Base flow (August to <br />February) release recommendations were also scaled to hydrologic conditions and ranged from <br />23 to 28 m'/s in dry years to 79 to 85 m'/s in wet years. Warmer releases (up to 15°C) and lower <br />summer base flows were also recommended to improve downstream water temperature <br />conditions for native fishes in the Green River. Specifically, water temperatures of 18 to 20°C <br />were targeted for two to five weeks in summer in Lodore Canyon. Another goal of warmer <br />summer water temperatures was to ensure that the Green River was no more than 5°C cooler <br />than the Yampa River, to reduce the possibility of cold shock to Colorado pikeminnow <br />Ptychocheilus lucius larvae as they drift downstream from the Yampa River. The range of flow <br />and temperature recommendations were expected to benefit all life stages of native, endangered <br />fishes and further their recovery. Muth et al. (2000) recognized "uncertainties" regarding effects <br />of recommended flow and temperature regimes. A primary uncertainty was the extent to which <br />native or endangered fishes might benefit from recommended flow and temperature regimes and <br />whether negative effects of hypothesized increased distribution and abundance of certain non- <br />native fishes would offset benefits. <br />In the years following 1996, some reservoir operations that matched recommendations in <br />Muth et al. (2000) occurred. For example, flows in excess of 226.6 m'/sec (8,000 cfs) were <br />released in spring 1997, and flows in excess of 283.3 m'/sec (10,000 cfs) were released in spring <br />1999. The magnitude of those spring releases, which were not exceeded since 1986, fell within <br />the 1992 Biological Opinion recommendations, but were rimed to be consistent with the Muth et <br />al. (2000) recommendations. In addition, low summer base flow releases in 2000 and 2001 were <br />patterned to follow the hydrologic water year (e.g., Muth et al. 2000). Also consistent with Muth <br />et al. (2000) recommendations, main channel temperatures in excess of 20°C were maintained in <br />Lodore Canyon in July and August 2000. <br />Because portions of the new flow and temperature recommendations occurred since <br />1996, we thought it timely to reinitiate sampling of the fish community downstream of Flaming <br />3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.