My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9456
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9456
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:57 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 5:03:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9456
Author
Van Steeter, M. M. and J. Pitlick.
Title
Aerial photograph/GIS Analysis and Field Studies of the 15 and 18 Mile Reach of the Colorado River.
USFW Year
1994.
USFW - Doc Type
Boulder.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />, <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Finally, a series of measurements were taken at a site in the 18 mile reach <br />to evaluate conditions under which the coarse bed material of the Colorado <br />River becomes mobile. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Setting <br />The study area covers approximately 32 miles (51 kilometers) of the <br />Colorado River near Grand Junction, Colorado (Fig. 1). This area is <br />commonly referred to as the 15 and 18 mile reach and is important habitat <br />for both the Colorado squawfish and razorback sucker (USFWS, 1987). The <br />flow of this part of the Colorado River is dominated by snowmelt with <br />peak flows occurring usually near the end of May (Fig. 2). The 1993 peak <br />flow was 1,250 cubic meters per second (m3/ s) (44,300 ft3/ s) which has a <br />recurrence interval of approximately 8 years. Both bank stabilizing <br />activities and changes in the natural flow regime have affected this area. <br />Much of the land along the 15 and 18 mile reach is privately owned. <br />Property owners have built dikes or stabilized the river channel in <br />attempts to stop the river from encroaching on their land. Dikes or <br />concrete debris confine the river on at least one of its banks throughout <br />much of the study area. As was discussed above, this decreases the river's <br />ability to migrate and potentially decreases the channel complexity. <br />In addition to bank stabilization, the hydrologic regime of the 15 and <br />18 mile reach has been altered by upstream water development. For <br />example, Liebermann et aI. (1989) suggested that flows at the Cameo gauge, <br />just upstream of the study site, have decreased through time due to <br />upstream water development. The median flow has decreased by 13% <br />when comparing the pre-intervention median (1934-49) to the post- <br />intervention median (1950-83). <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.