My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9295
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9295
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:57 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 4:53:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9295
Author
Chart, T. E., D. P. Svendson and L. Lentsch.
Title
Investigation of Potential Razorback Sucker (Xyrauchen texanus) and Colorado Squawfish (Ptychocheilus lucius) Spawning in the Lower Green River 1994 and 1995.
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
Moab, Utah.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
METHODOLOGY <br />,.-' <br />• t`~ <br />Adult . I• , ~ <br />~G~ r~ <br />The results incorporate pertinent data from the ISMP with specific study efforts. Sampling for <br />adult fish was completed using two techniques, electrofishing and trammel netting. Electrofishing <br />was conducted along the shorelines and in any flooded habitat available (most commonly tributary <br />or wash mouths). The electrofishing ~ boat was a 16' aluminum jon boat. The eiectrofishing <br />field was created with a pulsed DC current (typically 300 V; 5-7 amps; 20-40 mgHtz) generated <br />with an onboard AC generator converted through a Coffelt VVP-15. Electrofishing was <br />conducted in three reaches: `~ke~eAe~s from Swasey rapid (RM 131.8) to the town of <br />Green River, Ut. (RM 119.8)Z h ewe s m Green River (RM 119.8) to Ruby <br />Ranch (RM 97.0} ~ Th 'near Millard Canyon/ Anderson Bottom (RM 33.5/ RM I <br />31.0. Electrofishin was conducted on the ascendin hmb of the h dro ` (~ ~~ <br />g g ~ y graph for both species <br />Length and weight information~was collected from the entire fish community with the exception <br />of some trips in 1994. <br />Trammel nets were fished both actively (fished through runs) and passively. Trammel nets were <br />usually set for three to five hours, and were checked every two hours. <br />a l ~,n <br />C <br />_~~. <br />Endangered species larger thah 175mm TL were PIT tagged. ~~ G~- <br />Larval/YOY , _ ,~ 14.1 r <br />Li t tra sand seine w <br />8h p s ere used to sample larval and young of the year fish. Both of these l <br />sampling strategies were conducted inlow-velocity nursery habitats, such as main channel <br />~G <br />backwaters, flooded mouths of tributaries and flooded side canyons. In 1994, sampling began in ~~ <br />~~ <br />early May when the first larval suckers were captured in the middle Green River. In 1995, ~ <br />sampling began when Green River main channel temperatures warmed to 14 C. ~ ~~ <br />Light traps are a floating, quatrefoil design powered by two 1.5 V, D-cell batteries. Light trap <br />entry slit sizes varied from 2mm to 6mm, however most traps were 4mm. Light traps were usually <br />set in the late afternoon or early evening, and traps were picked up as close to sunrise as possible. <br />DRAFT 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.