My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8169a
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8169a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:57 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 4:48:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8169a
Author
Brookshire, D. S., M. McKee and G. Watts.
Title
Draft Economic Analysis of Proposed Critical Habitat Designation in the Colorado River Basin for the Razorback Sucker, Humpback Chub, Colorado Squawfish, and Bonytail.
USFW Year
1993.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
(discounted at 3 percent to yield a present value) yield a positive impact of $167.20 million <br />(1982$). These results hold for earnings impacts, for tax revenue impacts, and for <br />employment impacts. The present value of net earnings impacts for the basin is $49.70 <br />million, the value of the combined tax revenue impacts, $16.16 million. Present value is the <br />worth of a future stream of impacts expressed in terms of todays value. <br />Table I-E-1 reports the differences between the present values of the without fish projections <br />and the with fish projections expressed as a percentage of the without fish projections. The <br />percentage difference for the total output in the Basin is 0.0006 percent (i.e., six ten <br />thousandths of a percent). The figures for the remaining aggregate measures are. similar in <br />magnitude. Table I-E-1 also reports annualized values. The annualized value transforms a <br />fluctuating stream of impacts into a levelized equivalent present value. For the Basin <br />economy the annualized value of the output impact is a positive $8.36 million (1982$). <br />The State-level entries in Table I-E-1 demonstrate the second basic conclusion. The impacts <br />of proposed critical habitat designations are not distributed evenly over the individual States <br />in the Basin. In fact, during the study period impacts range from a positive $262.60 million <br />(California) to a negative $63.39 million (Utah). The reasons for these differences lie in the <br />nature of proposed recovery efforts for the endangered fishes. Streamflow requirements and <br />operational changes at Federal reservoirs may negatively impact recreation, electric power <br />production, and future consumptive water uses in some geographic areas, while these same <br />recovery efforts may enhance economic activity in others. This phenomenon is particularly <br />notable for the State of California, <br />vi <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.