My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8169a
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8169a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:57 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 4:48:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8169a
Author
Brookshire, D. S., M. McKee and G. Watts.
Title
Draft Economic Analysis of Proposed Critical Habitat Designation in the Colorado River Basin for the Razorback Sucker, Humpback Chub, Colorado Squawfish, and Bonytail.
USFW Year
1993.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
of the Act. Such consultations may identify reasonable and. prudent alternatives to destruction <br />or adverse modification of critical habitat that allow projects to proceed without significant <br />economic impacts. The Upper Basin and San Juan Recovery Implementation Programs <br />(RIPs) have allowed some water development in the Upper Basin to proceed concurrently <br />with efforts to recover endangered fishes. Participants in these programs intend for the RIPS <br />also to provide reasonable and prudent alternatives to the destruction or modification of <br />proposed critical habitat. <br />It is impossible, however, to predict the outcome of all future Section 7 Consultations <br />involving endangered fishes in the Colorado River Basin. If the Upper Basin and San Juan <br />RIPs do not show sufficient and timely progress in recovering endangered fishes, some <br />planned water developments may be modified, scaled back, or foregone. This assumption <br />provides an upper bound on the potential magnitude of economic effects associated with the <br />proposed critical habitat designations. If the RIPs are successful in achieving their objective, <br />many of the negative economic impacts described in this report can be avoided. <br />Utilizing projected economic growth data, economic activity levels were projected for the 20 <br />economic sectors. This assumed that no actions were taken to recover the endangered fishes <br />and formed the without fish scenario. Incorporating the changes in economic activity <br />necessary to recover the fishes led to a second set of economic projections - a with fish <br />scenario. The differences in the without fish and with fish formed the net economic impacts <br />of listing and proposed critical habitat designation. A methodology developed by the USFWS <br />for distinguishing between listing and critical habitat actions under the Act was applied to <br />determine the incremental impacts of the proposed critical habitat designation. <br />Regional Lnpacts <br />The incremental regional economic impacts of proposed critical habitat designations are <br />summarized, in part, in Table I-E-1. The data in this table illustrate the first basic conclusion <br />that can be drawn from the study. For the Colorado River Basin as a whole, regional <br />economic impacts are clearly positive. The stream of impacts over the study period <br />v , <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.