My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8169a
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8169a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:57 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 4:48:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8169a
Author
Brookshire, D. S., M. McKee and G. Watts.
Title
Draft Economic Analysis of Proposed Critical Habitat Designation in the Colorado River Basin for the Razorback Sucker, Humpback Chub, Colorado Squawfish, and Bonytail.
USFW Year
1993.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
C. Nonflow Related Activities <br />Nonflow activity related changes from the without fish scenario aze those that stem from <br />activities generated by oil and gas operations, mining operations (sand and gravel), <br />construction (recreation-and/or private dwellings), and the stocking of nonnative fishes. These <br />are activities that might well impinge upon the recovery of the endangered fishes. <br />1. Oil, Gas, and Other Drilling Activities <br />Significant amounts of oil and gas have been developed in the Colorado River Basin. Little, <br />however, is known regazding the effects of proposed critical habitat designation on this <br />production. The impacts to society of the additional cost of production resulting from listing <br />or critical habitat designation would be measured by a permanent loss of production. A <br />marginal production facility that is closed due to increased monitoring costs represents a loss <br />of production in the short term. Thus, the critical determination for well-related impacts <br />resulting -from contaminants is what percentage of producing wells will be capped and what <br />percentage of the actual production will truly be lost to society. For purposes of this report, <br />given the lack of available information, oil and gas impacts were assumed to be zero in the <br />seven-State region. <br />2. Nonnative Fish Stocking and Fish Program <br />A questionnaire was designed to determine the effects of critical habitat designation on the <br />stocking and fishing programs in the seven-States area. Nonflow effects on these programs <br />were determined through the use of personal interviews with State game and fish personnel.3 <br />3. Other Impacts <br />Other activities potentially impacted include sand and gravel operations, the construction <br />industry, and public recreation facilities. No data were available for the effects on sand and <br />3 There was a section of the survey that focused upon flow effects of the stocking program and these results were <br />incorporated into the recreation analysis. . <br />I-25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.