My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8149
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8149
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:57 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 4:48:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8149
Author
Phenicie, C. K. and J. R. Lyons.
Title
Tactical Planning in Fish and Wildlife Management and Research.
USFW Year
1973.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />After the plan is developed use the conditional sentence to <br /> <br />5. Reexamine the plan to determine that the composite attain- <br />ment of each item, beginning with the terminal items, will <br />build back to accomplish the primary objective. <br /> <br />Step 5 insures that no necessary element has been omitted from the plan. <br />By the same method determine that no elements are included which are not <br />necessary to attainment of superior objectives and, therefore, the primary <br />objective: <br /> <br />6. Reexamine the plan to determine that each item is necessary <br />to the accomplishment of the primary objective. <br /> <br />Terminal items whose paths to solution are not immediately evident from <br />existing knowledge or technology are candidates for solution by research <br />through literature review, consultations, and experimentation. The inductive <br />thought process is recommended whereby the question is explicitly stated at <br />each step, all of the alternatives are listed, alternative hypotheses are <br />devised, and crucial experiments are conducted to try and disprove some. <br />Graphic and typed formats for step-down planning are given. The former is <br />recommended for most plan development and display. <br /> <br />Deductive logic is a method of thinking that requires discipline to main- <br />tain in plan development. Our experience indicates that special caution must <br />be exercised to prevent the pattern of thought from shifting prematurely from <br />a problem orientation to processes and methods orientation. If this occurs <br />before terminal items are reached, the plan will not be valid. <br /> <br />Since management activities and much research are aimed at attaining <br />tactical objectives, rules are given whereby such objectives may be phrased. <br />To be meaningful and useful, an objective must (1) state fully what the worker <br />intends to accomplish; (2) exclude fully what is not the intent; and (3) <br />specify a recognizable end point so progress or attainment can be determined. <br />It is helpful if an objective can be worded in performance terms. <br /> <br />Use of the step-down method of action plan development will aim efforts <br />at precise problem solution. It will speed attainment of management goals <br />and allow research workers to concentrate on those areas of basic and applied <br />research which are needed. Plan development is from the top down, from the <br />complex to the less complex. Execution of the plan is from the bottom up, <br />from terminal items to the primary objective. <br /> <br />ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS <br /> <br />The idea of step-down planning and the six procedural steps are the prod- <br />uct of Ray H. Hess, Federal Aid Division, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and <br />Wildlife, Albuquerque, New Mexico. He presented the idea in a talk to Bureau <br />personnel in Washington, D.C., September 1968, and it was from these ideas <br />that we developed the concept presented in this paper. John G. Appelget <br />edited the paper and Arthur B. Eustis contributed valuable suggestions. <br /> <br />l5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.