Laserfiche WebLink
<br />After the plan is developed use the conditional sentence to <br /> <br />5. Reexamine the plan to determine that the composite attain- <br />ment of each item, beginning with the terminal items, will <br />build back to accomplish the primary objective. <br /> <br />Step 5 insures that no necessary element has been omitted from the plan. <br />By the same method determine that no elements are included which are not <br />necessary to attainment of superior objectives and, therefore, the primary <br />objective: <br /> <br />6. Reexamine the plan to determine that each item is necessary <br />to the accomplishment of the primary objective. <br /> <br />Terminal items whose paths to solution are not immediately evident from <br />existing knowledge or technology are candidates for solution by research <br />through literature review, consultations, and experimentation. The inductive <br />thought process is recommended whereby the question is explicitly stated at <br />each step, all of the alternatives are listed, alternative hypotheses are <br />devised, and crucial experiments are conducted to try and disprove some. <br />Graphic and typed formats for step-down planning are given. The former is <br />recommended for most plan development and display. <br /> <br />Deductive logic is a method of thinking that requires discipline to main- <br />tain in plan development. Our experience indicates that special caution must <br />be exercised to prevent the pattern of thought from shifting prematurely from <br />a problem orientation to processes and methods orientation. If this occurs <br />before terminal items are reached, the plan will not be valid. <br /> <br />Since management activities and much research are aimed at attaining <br />tactical objectives, rules are given whereby such objectives may be phrased. <br />To be meaningful and useful, an objective must (1) state fully what the worker <br />intends to accomplish; (2) exclude fully what is not the intent; and (3) <br />specify a recognizable end point so progress or attainment can be determined. <br />It is helpful if an objective can be worded in performance terms. <br /> <br />Use of the step-down method of action plan development will aim efforts <br />at precise problem solution. It will speed attainment of management goals <br />and allow research workers to concentrate on those areas of basic and applied <br />research which are needed. Plan development is from the top down, from the <br />complex to the less complex. Execution of the plan is from the bottom up, <br />from terminal items to the primary objective. <br /> <br />ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS <br /> <br />The idea of step-down planning and the six procedural steps are the prod- <br />uct of Ray H. Hess, Federal Aid Division, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and <br />Wildlife, Albuquerque, New Mexico. He presented the idea in a talk to Bureau <br />personnel in Washington, D.C., September 1968, and it was from these ideas <br />that we developed the concept presented in this paper. John G. Appelget <br />edited the paper and Arthur B. Eustis contributed valuable suggestions. <br /> <br />l5 <br />