My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8149
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8149
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:57 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 4:48:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8149
Author
Phenicie, C. K. and J. R. Lyons.
Title
Tactical Planning in Fish and Wildlife Management and Research.
USFW Year
1973.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />For those further interested in developing their skill in preparing use- <br />ful objectives, we recommend Mager's (1962) helpful book on preparation of <br />instructional objectives in education. It is cleverly written, easily read, <br />and most thought-provoking. <br /> <br />SUMMARY <br /> <br />Improved planning will enhance progress in the fish and wildlife field. <br />Step-down planning through deductive thinking is offered as a tool in tactical <br />planning to identify all necessary elements to solve a problem. There are six <br />steps in plan development. <br /> <br />The first step is to identify precisely a problem whose solution is <br />needed to produce benefits. <br /> <br />1. From the facts at hand, establish one simply stated, <br />single purpose, base item, or primary objective that <br />communicates the identity, nature, and depth of the <br />problem. <br /> <br />The question is then asked, to attain this objective, what obstacle(s) <br />must be overcome? In answer to this question, <br /> <br />2. Derive a second echelon of items that will accomplish <br />the firs t. <br /> <br />The question is repeated for each second and succeeding echelon objective <br /> <br />to <br /> <br />3. Derive a third, fourth, etc., echelon of items. <br /> <br />As each echelon is derived, its validity is tested with the conditional <br />sentence <br /> <br />If and only if <br /> <br />, then <br /> <br />This will determine with certainty that each antecedent (the lower of two <br />echelons in the plan) leads to and completes or accomplishes the conclusion <br />(the superior of two echelons). <br /> <br />4. Continue the logical derivation of subordinate objectives <br />until terminal items are reached, that is, items recognizable <br />as actions which can be performed, or items whose paths to <br />solution are not immediately evident from existing knowledge or <br />technology. <br /> <br />This deductive thought process breaks a relatively complex problem into <br />more items, each being less and less complex. It assures focus of attention <br />on the primary objective and specifies all actions necessary, and only those <br />actions which are necessary to attain that objective. <br /> <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.