Laserfiche WebLink
<br />administrators assign problems without realizing what is involved. From <br />plans they can see this. If the solution is beyond economic means, the <br />problem may be narrowed. If the problem must be solved with less effort or <br />in a shorter time period, steps to be eliminated can be studied, and the <br />administrator will be fully aware of the risks involved by the omissions. <br />Third, step-down plans have served as persuasive graphics in budget hearings <br />where decision makers can see clearly what is involved. Fourth, there is a <br />trend toward cooperative efforts within the disciplines and agencies at solv- <br />ing complicated problems. The graphic step-down plan facilitates delineation <br />of responsibilities. <br /> <br />We have laid out a logical system for choosing paths of endeavor for <br />profitable expenditure of our professional energies. Some will say that this <br />system is their present mental process for resolving a problem, and it may <br />well be. This is a way of thinking and no more. From our own experience, <br />and from others we observe, a common error emerges. The primary and imme- <br />diate lower echelon objectives may be phrased properly, but at some point <br />the worker invariably sets aside his mental discipline of identifying obsta- <br />cles and specifying solutions. Instead he reverts to his old pattern of <br />thinking by inserting those techniques he knows, by including the tools of <br />problem solving he was taught or has developed. His thinking becomes method <br />oriented instead of problem oriented, and the plan is not valid. If each <br />objective is clearly on target and if the conditional sentence is used to <br />test each echelon of objectives, this trap will be evaded. The plan will <br />outline needs and not contain simply "anything that comes to mind" (Regier, <br />1968) . <br /> <br />STATEMENT OF ACTION OBJECTIVES <br /> <br />. . . if you're not sure where you're going, you're <br />liable to end up someplace else - and not even know it. <br />(Mager, 1962) <br /> <br />In the same sense that the travel itinerary prearranges progress from a <br />known location for a timely arrival at a selected destination, the tactical <br />plan arranges for predictable stepwise progression from the present status of <br />knowledge of the problem to attainment of the objective. An objective, if <br />derived correctly, is the principal control point in management operations or <br />research. An objective is an end point, an accomplishment destination. Its <br />utility is in communicating this intended destination to the boss, to co- <br />workers and most important of all, to the worker himself. <br /> <br />In practice, the research and management objective often fits another <br />definition: A statement of intended pursuit wherein the worker may exercise <br />imagination and ingenuity without restriction in direction or scope. We have <br />heard the spirit of this definition vigorously defended by a number of fish <br />and wildlife workers, a defense we believe is groundless. Proposed management <br />and research accomplishments can be phrased specifically to support planning <br />for predictable attainment. More rapid and productive progress will be made <br />toward meeting needs of the resource when we learn to state where we are going <br />and when we intend to get there. <br /> <br />12 <br />