My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8141A
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8141A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:57 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 4:47:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8141A
Author
Wydoski, R. S. and W. T. Helm.
Title
Effects of Alterations to Low Gradient Reaches of Utah Streams.
USFW Year
1980.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
182
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />Streams are altered for highway construct on, flood control, mlnlng, land <br />reclamation, navigation, and other reasons. T ese alterations are often <br />engineering answers to problems that clearly a e interdisciplinary. Stream <br />channelization is a form of alteration which u ually results in straightening <br />the channel, thereby reducing the length of th original channel and increasing <br />the gradient and water velocity. In addition1 streambed substrate is removed, <br />pools are usually converted into riffles or r ns, and vegetation along the <br />streambank is removed. Following channelizat on, streambeds are known to <br />remain unstable for some time (Campbell, Kumar, and Johnson 1972). Unstable <br />substrate is believed to be the most significant factor related to changes in <br />fish and invertebrate populations following channelization (Etnier 1972). <br />Environmental changes of this kind have been shown to be detrimental to the <br />habitats of both aquatic and terrestrial orgarisms. <br />I <br />Public awareness of man1s detrimental e~fects to the environment has <br />received much interest recently (McEvoy 1973~ and people will demand more <br />ecological and environmental considerations In water project planning in the <br />future (McCloskey 1973). McCloskey has poin ed out that the public environ- <br />mental movement has had a great impact in th planning of water projects, <br />particularly in the West. <br /> <br />In the early 1970s, the public qUestion~d the use of federal and state <br />funds for stream channelization because of ~he detrimental impacts to the <br />environment. As a result, hearings were he~d on stream channelization during <br />the 1st session of the 92nd U.S. Congress ii May and June, 1971. After the <br />hearings, several in depth reviews were mad of the environmental impacts to <br />natural resources from stream alteration prjects (Little 1973, U.S. House of <br />Representatives 1973). The report to the U~S. Council on Environmental Quality <br />stated that at least 320,000 kilometers (20b,000 miles) of waterways have been <br />developed or modified in the United States ~ince the early 1800s without proper <br />planning, engineering, or finanCing (Littl~ 1973). The report also stated that <br />about 56,000 kilometers (35,000 miles) of ~tream channels have been modified <br />by small watershed programs since 1940 by ~he Corps of Engineers and Soil <br />Conservation Service. The larger federal rlood control and navigation projects <br />of the Corps of Engineers and Bureau of Reflamation are not included in this <br />mileage. In 1972, the Western Association of State Game and Fish Commissioners <br />adopted a resolution that vigorously opposes publicly funded stream channel- <br />ization programs until natural resource va~ues and recreation opportunities <br />are comprehensively evaluated. I <br />I <br />i <br />In the Intermountain West, stream ch~nnelization has been inventoried in <br />Montana and Idaho. Altered stream channels in 13 Montana streams produced only <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.