My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8012
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:57 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 4:45:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8012
Author
Grand Canyon Trust.
Title
Colorado River Workshop, issues, ideas, and directions (February 26-28, 1996 Phoenix, Arizona) An open forum for discussion of management issues between managers, water users, and stakeholders of the Colorado River basin.
USFW Year
1996.
USFW - Doc Type
1996.
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
242
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />III <br />WATER EFFICIENCIES <br /> <br />WHO BENEFITS? WHO PAYS? <br /> <br />Author <br />Jim Dyer <br /> <br />Panelists <br />Ted Lyon, Imperial Irrigation District <br />Chips Barry, Denver Water Department <br />Chelsea Congdon, Environmental Defense Fund <br />Tom Carr, AZ Department of Water Resources <br /> <br />OBSERVATIONS <br /> <br />The following observations serve as a general summary provided by the conference conveners and do not represent any <br />"consensus" of the workshop participants. The full (verbatim) notes from each breakout session are provided in this <br />report following the text of each discussion paper. <br /> <br />The panel discussion began with a presentation by <br />paper preparer Jim Dyer, who described water efficien- <br />cy improvements as a strategic means to stretch exist- <br />ing water resources among growing demands. He <br />urged broad education of all stakeholders about the <br />consequences of water use decisions, and pointed out <br />the importance of defining the goals of saving water. <br />The panelists included representatives of an irrigation <br />district, an urban water district, an environmental <br />organization, and a state water resources department. <br /> <br />Each discussed experiences with water efficiency <br />improvements, with a focus on the impacts of saving <br />water in one sector (e.g. agriculture) in order to meet <br />demands in another sector (e.g. municipal). <br /> <br />Following the panel presentations the participants <br />broke into four groups. Each started its discussion by <br />addressing the goals of water efficiency. Some of the <br />ideas common to all three groups included: maximiz- <br />ing resource availability; reducing costs; and improving <br /> <br />81 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.