My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8009 (2)
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
8009 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:23:38 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 4:37:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8009
Author
Natural Resources Law Center.
Title
Restoring the Waters.
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
Boulder, CO.
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
S <br />Benefits of collaborating <br />^ Reduced each utility's program <br />costs <br />^ Increased program credibility <br />^ Allowed customer participation <br />regardless of energy source for <br />their water heater <br />Free kit contents <br />^ One water- and energy-efficient <br />showerhead (2.5 gallons per <br />minute [gpm]) <br />^ One bathroom faucet aerator <br />(1.5 gpm) <br />^ One toilet fill cycle tliverter <br />^ Toilet leak detection dye tablets <br />^ Plumber's teflon tape <br />^ An instruction booklet, including <br />instructions on installing a glass <br />jar as a toilet tank displacement <br />device <br />Seattle Water Department Home Water Saver Program, Washington <br />Home Water Savers was adoor-to-door <br />conservation kit distribution program <br />offered initially in June through October <br />1992 by a regional utility partnership that <br />included the Seattle Water Department, <br />Seattle City Light and Puget Sound Power <br />and Light. The Bonneville Power Adminis- <br />tration (BPA), Washington Natural Gas <br />and the Municipality of Metropolitan <br />Seattle (METRO) (the regional wastewater <br />agency) also contributed financial support. <br />While conducting studies to update the <br />conservation element of the Seattle Water <br />Department's water supply plan, the <br />Department identified efficient <br />showerheads as one of the most cost- <br />effective measures to reduce demand. In <br />late 1989, the Seattle Water Department <br />conducted a pilot <br />study of 2,000 <br />single-family homes <br />to test distribution <br />methods and <br />installation rates for <br />various devices. <br />Based on the results <br />of this pilot, the <br />water department decided to pursue an <br />efficient showerhead program using a <br />door-to-door drop-off distribution method. <br />Economic analysis showed that the <br />program would be cost-effective even if the <br />Seattle Water Department had to cover the <br />entire program cost. Nevertheless, the <br />department sought involvement from other <br />regional utilities because of the energy and <br />wastewater savings the program could <br />achieve along with water savings. <br />The Water Saver Program <br />The overall goal of the program was to <br />reduce consumption of water and energy <br />resources in the participating utilities' <br />service territories. High installation rate of <br />kit devices was a corresponding program <br />goal, which influenced product selection, <br />choice of delivery mechanism, marketing <br />approaches and other program features. <br />44 <br />Each element of program planning (prod- <br />uct selection, marketing, distribution and <br />evaluation) involved a committee process <br />that included representatives from each <br />agency. Additionally, a steering committee <br />and a planning committee were established <br />to ensure coordination and to make overall <br />policy and management decisions. The <br />1992 summer "household blitz" was <br />mounted by the electric utilities, which <br />contracted with a service agency and a <br />private contractor to perform the distribu- <br />tion. <br />To ensure customer satisfaction and <br />measure persistence, the utilities conducted <br />an extensive customer preference study to <br />determine which showerhead should be <br />included in the kits. The study included <br />on-site product comparison testing as well <br />as a survey component. Customers in the <br />survey were offered six showerhead <br />models to choose from. The model selected <br />for the program was preferred by 67% of <br />the customers surveyed. <br />The initial phase of the program, from <br />June through October 1992, involved <br />door-to-door distribution of kits to all one- <br />to four-unit dwellings (330,000 house- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.