Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The inexorable laws of <br />economics appear to be <br />leading to the conservation <br />of water through reduction <br />of losses and increased <br />efficiency. <br /> <br />Beneficiaries of water <br />projects should pay for them <br />through user charges. <br /> <br />Findings Based on Seven Themes <br /> <br />In its brief summary report, New Directions in Us. Water Policy,2 transmitted to the <br />President and Congress on June 28, 1973, the Commission identified seven <br />recurring themes that emerged from its studies and provided the foundation <br />for its conclusions and recommendations. First, the demand for water in the <br />future is not on an inevitable growth trend but depends in large part on policy <br />decisions within the control of society, Second, the Commission saw a shifting <br />of national priorities away from water development toward preservation and <br />enhancement of water quality, including uses of water for recreation, aesthetics <br />and preservation of the balance of nature. <br /> <br />In identifying these first two themes, the Commission was reporting its <br />agreement with the findings expressed in a number of its studies. Events during <br />the past 10 years confirm the significance of the Commission's observations. The <br />concept of alternative futures espoused by the Commission is reflected in the <br />best planning operations, and it is widely understood that water demands are <br />influenced by government policies. <br /> <br />The US, Water Resources Council, in its SecondNationalAssessment ofWater Supply <br />andDemand,3 included estimates of future demands in the several water resources <br />regions under two sets of assumptions. The report forecasts lower water use in <br />certain industries in the decade ahead as a result of increased recycling and <br />greater efficiency in the use of water. Likewise, the shift in national priorities <br />noted by the Commission is continuing as legislation enacted prior to the <br />Commission's report is implemented and as public interest in environmental <br />preservation is stimulated by the activities of environmental groups. <br /> <br />The Land-Water Connection <br /> <br />The remaining themes epitomized the substance of the Commission's principal <br />recommendations. Thus, the third theme dealt with the need to tie water <br />resources planning more closely to land use planning. Efforts to do this under <br />the Water Resources planning Act of 1965 were not very successful. Agreat many <br />plans were prepared that lacked public support and could not be implemented, <br /> <br />One reason for the difficulty of producing successfully integrated and acceptable <br />plans may well be that responsibilities for land use planning are in state and <br />local governments, while water planning activities have been largely dominated <br />by federal agencies. The experiment now under way in the Red River valley of <br />the North, attempting to develop a "grass-roots" approach to water management, <br />might, if successful, lead to effective integration of land and water planning. <br /> <br />Reduced Losses, Increased Efficiency <br /> <br />The inexorable laws of economics appear to be driving the nation to acceptance <br />and implementation of the Commission's fourth theme, expressed in its <br />recommendation for policies leading to the conservation of water through <br />reduction of losses and increased efficiency. Recent statistics on water use in <br />industry show substantial reductions in water use per unit of output. <br /> <br />Increasing domestic water bills, as the costs of developing new water supplies <br />rise, will have the same effect on per capita water use. Events such as the <br />California drought and increases in the cost of energy for pumping in the mid- <br />1970s helped lead to reductions in water use for irrigation. <br /> <br />A System of User Charges <br /> <br />The Commission's ftfth theme, calling for sound economic principles in water <br />resources decision-making, led to its recommendation that, to the extent <br />practicable, beneficiaries of water projects should pay for them through user <br />charges, Both the Carter and the Reagan Administrations adopted this policy, <br />but it is not yet accepted as a general principle by the Congress. <br /> <br />9 <br />