Laserfiche WebLink
<br />progress Toward a National Water Policy <br /> <br /> <br />The massive report of the <br />Commission remains in <br />official limbo. <br /> <br />It is widely understood that <br />water demands are <br />influenced by government <br />policies. <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />Theodore M. Schad <br />Executive Director <br />National Ground Water Policy Forum <br />and <br />Executive Director <br />National Water Commission 1968-1973 <br /> <br />Discussion of the need for a national water policy is not new. The 1973 <br />report of the NationalWlter Commission focused on seven themes which, <br />12 years later, can serve to show us how far we've come - and how far <br />we have yet to go. <br /> <br />In some circles it is popular to deplore the lack of a national water resources <br />policy and to predict a national water crisis with economic consequences more <br />dire than those caused by the" energy crisis" of the 1970s. Before succumbing <br />to the malaise of doom and gloom engendered by such predictions, however, <br />it is well to look at what has actually happened in the water policy field in the <br />past decade and where we appear to be heading. <br /> <br />The epochal report of the National Water Commission issued in June of 1973 <br />provides a convenient benchmark from which to start. The Commission was <br />created by act of Congress in 1968 as an outgrowth of the controversy over the <br />use of the waters of the Colorado River Basin, Authorization of the Central Arizona <br />Project created a situation wherein the demands for water in the lower Colorado <br />River Basin exceed the long-term average supply. Rather than have the Congress <br />address this problem through studies directed only at the Colorado River Basin, <br />the Bureau of the Budget suggested an objective study of all the water problems <br />of the entire United States, leading to policy recommendations aimed at solving <br />future water problems, <br /> <br />A Review of the Nation's Water Problems <br /> <br />The legislation creating the National Water Commission directed it to review all <br />present and anticipated national water problems, to identify alternative ways of <br />meeting water requirements, to consider the economic and social consequences <br />of water resources development, to provide advice to the President and the Water <br />Resources Council upon request and to report on its studies simultaneously to <br />the President and the Congress. <br /> <br />The Commission was chaired by Charles F Luce and consisted of seven members <br />appointed by PresidentsJohnson and Nixon, None of the Commission members <br />was permitted to have any other federal government position. With the $5 million <br />appropriated for its work, the Commission directed a wide-ranging and objective <br />program of studies of all aspects of water resources policy. It published over <br />60 background studies, held hearings on its studies and on the draft of its report, <br />and received input from over 7000 individuals and institutions that commented <br />on its draft report. After consideration of the comments received, the <br />Commission transmitted its final report to the President and the Congress on <br />June 14, 1973, <br /> <br />Unfortunately, the concluding step contemplated by the National Water <br />Commission Act, transmittal of the Commission's report by the President to the <br />Congress with his comments and recommendations for legislation, was never <br />completed. The massive report of the Commission, Water Policies for the Future,! <br />with more than 200 recommendations for improving national water policy, <br />remains in official limbo. Nevertheless, the Commission's report has had a <br />considerable impact on the evolution of national water policy in the past 10 years, <br />and many of its recommendations are being implemented, <br />