Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Trends in Water Management <br /> <br /> <br />We are being forced to deal <br />with how we are going to <br />use our finite water supplies. <br /> <br />We are past the point where <br />the answer to every <br />question can be "build more <br />dams." There may be <br />nothing to fill them with. <br /> <br />Many more people are <br />getting into the decision- <br />making process. <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />Edwin H. Clark II, Ph.D. <br />Senior Associate <br />The Conservation Foundation <br /> <br />Change is always a slow process, and water management is no exception. <br />we are beginning, however, to confront certain realities about water- <br />realities that will change forever the ways we view and manage our water <br />resources. <br /> <br />Superficially, very little seems to be happening in relation to water resource <br />policy. When we look more carefully, however, we can see some dramatic trends. <br />Inexoribly, we are being forced to deal with some fundamental water resource <br />issues, to answer some basic questions on how we are going to use our finite <br />water supplies, <br /> <br />As in the past, we may dream of ways to avoid these issues - sucking water <br />though giant straws from the Great Lakes or the Yukon River, making freshwater <br />from the oceans, bringing Alabamas climate to Colorado through weather <br />modification, or other wondrous fixes. Increasingly, we are realizing that they <br />are only dreams. We may attempt to ignore reality - as we have done in the <br />Colorado River Basin - by authorizing more projects and more allocations than <br />there is water available. Increasingly, however, we are recognizing that our <br />supplies are, in fact, limited. <br /> <br />Confronting Reality <br /> <br />Although retreats to dreams and willful ignorance will undoubtedly persist, we <br />are steadily being pushed, by a combination of factors, to confront reality. The <br />most important factor is, of course, that only so much water is available: As our <br />demand for it increases, we cannot continue to avoid difficult decisions about <br />how the available supplies will be allocated or reallocated. We are past the point <br />where the answer to every question can be "build more dams." There may be <br />nothing to fill them with, <br /> <br />A second factor is the economic and budgetary trends of the past decade - <br />trends likely to continue for the foreseeable future. We often cannot afford to <br />build new dams even if there is water to fill them, much less pay fOr transporting <br />the Great Lakes to Texas. <br /> <br />A third trend is that many more people are getting into the decision-making <br />process. The previously exclusive domain of a relatively limited number of water <br />users must now be expanded to include environmentalists, Indians, academics, <br />recreationists and taxpayers. <br /> <br />There is every reason to expect that these trends will only intensify over the <br />foreseeable future, forcing us to deal with some basic policy questions regarding <br />both water quantity and water quality. who is going to decide how we use our <br />water?Who is going to pay for our water policies? And most fundamentally, what <br />do we want to use our limited water supplies for? <br /> <br />The Federal Response <br /> <br />The federal government has made very little progress in answering any of these <br />questions, It has dismantled the institutions responsible for formulating and <br />analyzing water policies; reduced the amount of the information it collects, as <br />well as (through budget and personnel cuts) its ability to use that information <br />effectively; and made it generally more difficult for the public to obtain the <br />information that is collected. <br />