Laserfiche WebLink
These numbers will minimize the likelihood of inbreeding. Broodstocks will be <br />developed through paired matings that produce pedigreed family lots. An <br />effective population size of 50 fish will result in an inbreeding rate of only <br />1%, which is considered acceptable for maintaining genetic diversity of wild <br />fish stocks. <br />When stocks are low, a minimum breeding strategy using a 5 X 5 di-allele cross <br />will be used. A 5 X 5 breeding strategy has an effective population size of <br />10 fish and an estimated inbreeding rate of 5%. In the event that 5 males and <br />5 females are not available, a factorial mating will be used to capture the <br />genetic contribution from all fish of the least numerous sex. However, <br />additional wild adults will be used to supplement the broodstock that are <br />developed from a 5 X 5 or factorial cross when they are available. This will <br />increase the effective population size that will in turn reduce the estimated <br />inbreeding rate over time. <br />II. PHILOSOPHY AND GOALS FOR GENETICS MANAGEMENT <br />A. Background. various water development projects throughout the Region have <br />created barriers to fish passage or changed the hydrology of river <br />systems, thereby affecting stream flows, water temperatures, sediment, and <br />habitats that are crucial to the successful recruitment of endemic fishes <br />(U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1987a, 1987b, 1990a 1990b, 1991). Non- <br />native fishes have been introduced, either intentionally or accidentally. <br />They have become established and are suspected to be competitors with, or <br />predators on, the native species (Miller et al. 1982). These biological • <br />and environmental changes have resulted in the endemic fishes, razorback <br />sucker (Xvrauchen texanus), bonytail (Gila ele ans), humpback chub (Gila <br />cypha), Colorado squawfish (Ptychocheilus lucius), pallid sturgeon <br />(Scaohirhvnchus albus), Neosho madtom oturus lacidus <br />(N P ), greenback <br />cutthroat trout (Oncorhvnchus clarki stomias) and others being listed as <br />endangered, threatened, or candidate species under the Endangered Species <br />Act of 1973, as amended. <br />To protect endangered fishes, while allowing continued water development, <br />the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) coordinated development of <br />the Upper Colorado River Recovery Implementation Program (Program) for <br />endangered fish (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1987a, 1987b).. This <br />program includes participation by the States of Colorado, Utah, and <br />Wyoming; U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Service, Western Area Power <br />Administration, water development interests, and environmental <br />organizations (Wydoski and Hamill 1991). Similar coordinated partnership <br />approaches have been undertaken for recovery of the greenback cutthroat <br />trout, pallid sturgeon, bull trout, arctic fluvial grayling and others. <br />B. Philosoohv and Goals for Genetics Management. Our philosophy is to <br />maintain the genetic integrity of wild and captive-reared fishes in all <br />waters of Region 6. The rationale for this philosophy is that natural <br />refugia provide a source of preadapted genetic diversity that increases <br />the probability for successful recovery of the species (Krueger et al. <br />2 40