My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7809
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7809
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:57 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 4:05:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7809
Author
Wydoski, R. S.
Title
Responses of Trout Populations to Alterations in Aquatic Environments
USFW Year
1978.
USFW - Doc Type
A Review, reprinted from John R. Moring, ed., Proceedings of the Wild Trout - Catchable Trout Symposium.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />(1962), Schenberger and Funk (1971), Smith <br />and Larimore (1963), Stroud (1971), Stroud <br />(1972), Warner and Porter (1960), Wene and <br />Wickleff (1940), and Whitney and Bailey <br />(1959) . <br /> <br />The effects of channel alterations on <br />fish populations in thirteen Montana streams <br />was documented by Peters and Alvord (1974). <br />Natural reaches o~ these streams contained <br />nearly 3.5 times the number and nearly 9 <br />times the biomass of trout when compared <br />with altered reaches (Fig. ~). In addition, <br />the natural reaches contained over 10 times <br />the number and nearly 10 times the biomass <br />of mountain whitefish Iprosopium williamso- <br />nil than altered reaches. In Idaho, natur- <br />al stream reaches contained between 1.5 and <br />112 times the biomass (average B) of game <br />fish when compared to altered reaches (Geb- <br />hards 1970). Over a third (39%) of the <br />length of 45 stream channels surveyed in <br />Idaho (1,831 km or 1,138 mil has been alter- <br />ed and fish production was believed to re- <br />main 80-90% below the original levels up to <br />86 years after the alteration. Similar <br />relationships apparently hold for warmwater <br />fish species since Tarplee et al. (1971) <br />reported that fish over 6 in in length were <br />75% lower in number in altered reaches of <br />coastal plain streams in North Carolina. <br />The standing crop of invertebrates was 8 <br />times greater in natural portions of the <br />~1issouri River (Morris et a1. 1968). <br />Yerke (1971) has stated the importance of <br />preserving the pre-existing hydraulic gradi- <br />ent when stream channels are relocated. By <br />working with a stream and not against it, <br />biologists and engineers can perhaps even <br />improve the habitat for fish when stream <br />channels are moved. <br /> <br />Dams <br /> <br />In the arid and semi-arid western <br />states, the economy depends upon storage <br />of water from the annual runoff for use at <br />another time of the year. As a result, <br />reservoirs have been fuilt for supplying <br /> <br />water for agricultural, industrial, and <br />municipal uses. In other parts of the <br />country, dams are built to supply hydro- <br />electric power without much consumptive use. <br />Additional dams are contemplated to be built <br />in the future. For example, a three-fold <br />increase in the demand water for municipal <br />use is anticipated to accomodate the 253% <br />increase in the urban population of the <br />Colorado River Basin (Crawford and Peterson <br />1974). In addition, large quantitites of <br />water will be needed for steam-generating <br />plants, development of coal through gasifi- <br />cation, extraction of other minerals such <br />as trona, and development of the oil shale <br />deposits in this part of the country (Cran- <br />dall1974). The impoundment of streams <br />causes changes in the sediment load, water <br />temperature, water quality, and streamflow <br />and changes of stream environments into re- <br />servoir environments. Often the building <br />of a dam is an irreversible process that <br />should be carefully considered in future <br />water development. The fishery that is <br />generated from the reservoir may not re- <br />place the stream fishery that may be lost. <br />Utah, for example, only contains about 60 <br />milea of Class 1 trout streams. <br /> <br />Trout production in 105 Idaho reser- <br />voirs appeared to be limited by the follow- <br />ing factors: (1) paucity of spawning or <br />nursery areas (69.5%); (2) drawn down <br />(62.0%); (3) competition (51.9%); (4) temp- <br />erature (31.4%); (5) food supply (19.0%); <br />and (6) dissolved oxygen (15.2%) (Gebhards <br />1975). When streams are impounded, those <br />species that can best adapt to the newly <br />environmental conditions usually explode <br />in numbers. Often various species of <br />minnows and suckers will populate the reser- <br />voirs in western United States and are <br />believed to be competitors with game spe- <br />cies. Because of the lack of spawning <br />or nursery areas and the competition from <br />undesirable species, wild trout only com- <br />pose 20% of the total catch in 6.1% of 916 <br />reservoirs in the mountain region of the <br /> <br /> . - Natural II - Altered <br />878~ [ TROUT [.,. ] 344~ <br /> ~ <br />.m [ ~ WHITE. r:- ] <br /> FISH 1065% <br />4 3 2 1 0 0 I 2 3 4 5 <br /> BI~4ASS (kg XIO) NUMBER OF FISH (XIOO) <br /> <br />Figure 4. The effect of stream channel alterations on fish populations in thirteen Mon- <br />tana streams. (From Peters and Alvord 1964) <br /> <br />61 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.