My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7781
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7781
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:56 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 4:03:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7781
Author
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Title
Recovery Plan for WOUNDFIN,
USFW Year
1979.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
B-6. A form of this recommendation has been incorporated into the <br />final Recovery Plan. <br />B-7. Woundfin populations should be monitored in the Virgin River and <br />reintroduction localities until the species no longer faces extinc- <br />tion and can be down-listed. <br />B-8. Agree that the Team should not be monitoring woundfin populations <br />in the Virgin River. This effort is now being contracted out to a <br />single group as agreed upon by the three state agencies involved. <br />B-9. The Habitat Management Plans alluded to have been combined into <br />one master Habitat Management Plan. Specif is details have been <br />omitted from the Recovery Plan but will be made available to the <br />Bureau of Land Management through the state and federal agencies <br />involved and the Team. <br />B-10. Several potential reintroduction sites have been suggested in <br />the Recovery Plan. The rivers suggested here are all above the <br />Grand. Canyon and are outside of the historic range of the woundfin, <br />as is the Paria River originally suggested in the draft Recovery <br />Plan. <br />B-11. The figure is the estimated cost to make one transplant of wound- <br />fin from the Virgin River. Most reintroduction efforts will <br />include several transplants over a 3-5 year period and two trans- <br />plants are suggested for Arizona (Gila and Verde rivers). <br />B-12. Cost has been increased. <br />B-13. At present the designation of critical habitat for reintroduced <br />populations is in a great state of flux. The approach suggested <br />in the Recovery Plan seems reasonable until more definite guide- <br />lines are available. <br />B-14. In many cases, the costs have been increased to meet current <br />prices. <br />B-15. This change has been made in the final Recovery Plan. <br />C-l. These suggestions have been incorporated into the final Recovery <br />Plan. <br />C-2. Population projections alone for the St. George, Utah, area <br />indicate a definite increasing demand on the Virgin River water. <br />C-3. The proposal for woundfin critical habitat was published in the <br />November 2, 1977, Federal Register and included the Virgin River <br />from LaVerkin Springs to Lake Mead and the lower six-miles of <br />LaVerkin Creek. Plans were to refine this in the final rule- <br />50 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.