My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7781
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7781
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:56 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 4:03:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7781
Author
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Title
Recovery Plan for WOUNDFIN,
USFW Year
1979.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 14, Potential Destruction, Lines 8 and 9 - More information is <br />needed on why and where habitat will be destroyed through excessive <br />siltation. We believe the statement that "habitat will be destroyed <br />C ~ through excessive siltation" is in error and ignores the natural hydrologic <br />potentials of the river and actions of floodflows which will not be <br />diverted. <br />Page 14, Potential Destruction, Lines 13 and 14 --The description of the <br />La Verkin Springs Unit is not quite correct. The sentence <br />. through a series of low profile, collapsible dams" should be <br />changed as follows: <br />" by bypassing riverflows around the springs through use of a <br />low-profile dam and pipeline; and collecting the springs flow <br />behind a low-profile control dam." <br />Page 15, Second para raph - Virtually all irrigation structures and all <br />allocations of the Virgin River waters were established by the early <br />C 2 1900's. An analysis of population projections, water rights, and water <br />needs shows that significant changes in the habitat of the Virgin River <br />are unlikely. <br />Page 16, Conservation Efforts - Add the city of St. George as funding <br />the Vaughn Hansen study. <br />B ~ ~ Page 22, Item 245 - The Bureau of Reclamation is opposed to designating <br />as critical habitat those areas where woundfin are transplanted. We <br />feel that such action would- establish a dangerous precedent. <br />Page 23,-Line 6 - The reference to a specific number of individuals <br />B 4 seems arbitrary. On what scientific data was it based? <br />Page 23, Item 11 - You state that "Some of the habitat in the Virgin <br />C ~ River obviously cannot support woundfin . . . ." Why, then, is the <br />entire reach of the river from La Verkin Springs to Lake Mead nominated <br />for critical habitat? <br />C ~ ~ Page 24, paragraph 112,~Lines 5 and 6 - The Vaughn Hansen study provides <br />data on flow volume requirements for maintenance of viable habitat. <br />C c Page 26, paragraphs 141 and 142 - Some estimates should be given of the <br />•7 amount of land adjacent to the river that will be acquired. <br />C 6 Page 30, paragraph 245 - The Bureau of Reclamation is opposed to this <br />action. <br />Appendix 1, page 1, paragraph 1 - The statement ". no one knows if <br />the Virgin River woundfin population numbers are higher or lower than <br />37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.