Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~~ W. 0. Nelson <br />23 February 1978 <br />drafting of something as potentially vital to the welfare of an endangered <br />species as a habitat management plan would seem more logically to fall within <br />the purview of the Recovery Team itself. <br />This recovery plan, Like others reviewed by Arizona Game and Fish, <br />suffers from one other shortcoming. It fails to indicate to any satisfaction <br />the basis for the cost estimates, e.g. man days of effort, travel costs, <br />A ~ equipment, etc. It also fails to indicate the financial contribution expected <br />from each agency. Without such information it will be impossible to budget <br />for, or receive Commission approval for, activities outlined in the recovery <br />`plan. <br />We hope the shortcomings we've drawn attention will be addressed before <br />the final plan is approved. <br />Sincerely, <br />RAJ:rb <br />Robert Ja en, Director <br />31 <br />