Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Transferring water from one basin to another has been, and will <br />continue to be, a source of political controversy. As legal as it may <br />be, nobody likes to see water diverted from their region to another <br />region. <br /> <br />There has been a clamor for "basin-of-Origin" legislation for <br />many years. Some bills proposed have been honest attempts to address <br />this problem ... others appear to be thinly disguised attempts to stop <br />water diversions period. <br /> <br />I think we all recognize by now that legislation designed to <br />merely stop diversion will be unsuccessful because growth, even at <br />modest levels, requires adequate water. What can be done is to <br />provide protection and equity for those areas that have water <br />available. <br /> <br />Water providers understand very well that, in this day and age, a <br />project will succeed only when there is a fair accommodation with in- <br />basin interests. Protecting basins of origin is an important <br />responsibility, which should be executed on a "case-by-case basis" ... <br />between and among the parties at interest. This will allow for the <br />fashioning of creative, flexible resolutions of the individual issues <br />raised by that particular transfer. Protection of basin of origin <br />does not lend itself to a prescriptive, cut and dried state-wide <br />doctrine. <br /> <br />As a component of our Northern Project, Thornton has been <br />voluntarily providing payment in lieu of taxes to Northern Colorado <br />entities for over five years. The City has also agreed to contribute <br />financing for new projects with the Water Supply and Storaae Ditch <br />Company. Thornton, of course, benefits from the company's new <br />projects, but the point is that water providers can and do act <br />responsibly without statutory prescriptions when these situations are <br />handled in a positive, forward looking manner. <br /> <br />OBSERVATION #3 -- Water conservation isn't iust low-flow toilets. <br /> <br />Everyone is in agreement as to the importance of water <br />conservation. The City and County of Denver should obviously be <br />applauded for bringing its metering program on-line faster"than <br />expected. While a great deal of attention has been given to metering, <br />building codes, retrofit devices, and xeriscaping, I believe we also <br />need to focus on "supply-side" conservation. By "supply-side" <br />conservation, I'm referring to water reuse and raw water exchanges. <br />These mechanisms have the potential of making major supplies of water <br />available to the Front Range and, therefore, should be aggressively <br />pursued. <br /> <br />The ways in which we can get the most out of municipal water <br />supplies, giving special attention to cooperative efforts between <br />municipalities and the agricultural sector -- such as those John Akolt <br />will probably describe this afternoon -- must be carefully explored <br />and, where feasible, promptly implemented. Again, Lee Rozaklis's <br />draft report catalogues some of these opportunities and identifies <br />issues to be further addressed. <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />j <br />