Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />fl <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />FI <br />i <br /> <br />2.2.23 Environmental Baseline with Sandstone Reservoir Providing Supplemental <br />Irrigation and Municipal Water (EB/SS-M). The EB/SS-M run simulated operation of the <br />Little Snake River over the 1930-1982 period of record using the same demand schedule <br />prepared for the EB run with the addition of Sandstone Reservoir. Under Scenario <br />EB/SS-M, Sandstone Reservoir provided supplemental water to Wyoming irrigation rights, <br />and supplemental municipal water to Baggs and Dixon in the amount of 200 acre-feet <br />over the July-September period each year. Also, a minimum flow for fisheries of 24 c.f.s. <br />was provided below Sandstone Dam to the Savery Creek mouth. <br />flow and to supplement only Wyoming irrigation demands. Irrigation demands on <br />Under EB/SS-M, Sandstone Reservoir storage water was used to meet the fishery <br />reservoir water by Wyoming rights below the dam were limited to a total supply of 0.5 <br />c.f.s. per 70 acres. <br />2.2.2.4 Environmental Baseline with Sandstone Providing Supplemental Irrigation and <br />Municipal Water, and Industrial Water (EB/SS-I). The EB/SS-I run used the same <br />demands as the EB/SS-M run with the addition of an annual release of 20,000 acre-feet <br />for industrial use at Baggs, provided at a constant rate year-round (27.6 c.f.s.). Under the <br />EB/SS-I run, storage water provided supplemental irrigation water only to Wyoming rights <br />with demands on this water limited to a total supply of 0.5 c.f.s. per 70 acres. This <br />scenario with some modifications has been selected as the Water Development Baseline <br />for this study. The EB/SS-I run included the Two Bar Canal and Boone Lateral rights, <br />17 <br />