Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Nc <br />G <br />2 <br />~_ <br />L.L <br />.~ <br />LL, <br />U <br />z <br />Q <br />w <br />w <br />O <br />u, <br />C~ <br />.20 <br />.15 <br />.10 <br />.05 <br />0 <br />85 <br />86 TT <br />87 ~ 1 <br />88 ~ 83 <br />~ T 84 <br />2 I I <br />i i i i <br />10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 <br />MAXIMUM-ANNUAL DISCHARGE (CFS X 1000) <br />Figure 8. Plot of geometric-mean catch per effort (C/E) versus maximum-annual <br />discharge (stateline gage) for post-larval Colorado squawfish collected <br />in the Colorado River between river miles 0 and 110 during October, <br />1982-1988. Lines indicate ± 1 standard error; numbers indicate year of <br />collection. Excerpted from McAda and Kaeding (1989). <br />the observed differences: none-the-less, spring runoff is obviously important <br />to successful reproduction by Colorado squawfish. <br />Numerous investigators have found relations between maximum-annual <br />discharge and the relative abundance of other fish species (McAda and Kaeding <br />1989; Osmundson and Kaeding 1989, 1990; Valdez 1990). Considerable variation <br />exists, but in general, relative abundance of young-of-the-year of native <br />species is positively correlated with maximum-annual discharge and relative <br />abundance of introduced species is negatively correlated with the same value. <br />Osmundson and Kaeding (1989) observed that fathead minnow Pimephales promelas, <br />red shiner Notropis lutrensis, and sand shiner N. stramineus developed large <br />26 <br />