My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7740
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7740
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:56 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 3:53:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7740
Author
McAda, C. W. and L. R. Kaeding.
Title
Physical Changes in the Gunnison and Colorado Rivers Resulting from Construction of the Aspinall Unit and Related Projects, with Hypotheses to Assess the Effects on the Endangered Fishes
USFW Year
1991.
USFW - Doc Type
Final Report.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
complex-channel segments (Osmundson and Kaeding 1990). The complex segments <br />provide a greater diversity of habitats for Colorado squawfish to utilize for <br />feeding, resting, and other activities. High spring flows are important in <br />maintaining these aYeas. <br />High spring flows are also important to successful reproduction of <br />Colorado squawfish. McAda and Kaeding (1989) reported higher reproductive <br />success in the Colorado River during years of moderately high flow. The Fish <br />and Wildlife Service conducted fall surveys to determine relative abundance of <br />young-of-the-year (YOY) Colorado squawfish in the Colorado River from 1982 to <br />1985 (Archer et al. 1985). F~eginning in 1986, similar surveys were conducted <br />by the states of Utah and Co]orado as part of the Interagency Standardized <br />Monitoring Program (ISMP). ]:SMP divided the river into two reaches (1, RM 0- <br />110 and 2, RM 140-170), based on the known distribution of Colorado squawfish <br />(Archer et al. 1985). McAda and Kaeding (1989) used the FWS and ISMP data to <br />compare relative abundance off: YOY Colorado squawfish in fall with maximum- <br />annual discharge (mean-daily flow on the highest day) the previous spring <br />(Figure 8). They found a parabolic relation in reach 1--the highest relative <br />abundance of YOY Colorado squawfish occurred in 1985 and 1986 when spring <br />flows peaked at 32,800 and 38,200 cfs at the stateline gage (peak flows at <br />Cisco were 34,100 and 43,200 cfs). Relative abundance was lower in years that <br />had lower and substantially Higher peak discharges (Figure 8). McAda and <br />Kaeding (1989) found no clear relation in reach 2 for the years they studied, <br />but Osmundson and Kaeding (1~~90) showed a positive relation between relative <br />abundance of age-0 Colorado :>quawfish and maximum-annual discharge for about <br />the same reach during 1986 to 1989. It is not yet clear whether spring runoff <br />itself or another variable c:Losely related to spring runoff is responsible for <br />25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.