Laserfiche WebLink
developed, but have yet to have a plan <br />initiated, have been listed longer than <br />3 years. The 7% constitutes the actual <br />recovery plan backlog in the Fish and <br />Wildlife Service. <br />Most of the species considered to be <br />improving are mammals, birds, or <br />plants. A significant majority of them <br />are recovering from very low num- <br />bers, with the benefit of intensive, <br />hands-on management. Bird and fish <br />species represent the taxa considered <br />to be the most stable. The unknown <br />component is most pronounced in <br />invertebrates, reflecting a need for <br />additional studies. Three-fourths of <br />the prominent declining status of in- <br />vertebrates are freshwater mussels. <br />Species with approved recovery plans <br />have a higher percentage of improv- <br />ing status designations than those <br />without plans (14% versus 3%). <br />Implementation of recovery plan <br />tasks provide significant gains <br />towards positive species recovery ef- <br />forts. The most significant recovery <br />status difference between the species <br />with and without approved recovery <br />plans is the number of "unknowns- <br />for those species without recovery <br />plans (25% "unknowns" without <br />plans versus 16 % with plans). <br />Recovery plans also outline research <br />efforts needed to assess a species' sta- <br />tus and begin the downward trend <br />reversal. <br />Four hundred and thirty-nine of the <br />581 species (76%) have less than <br />25% of their recovery objectives <br />achieved. The high percentage <br />includes all species listed within the <br />last three years. In addition, it indi- <br />cates the long-term nature of listed <br />species recovery. <br />Summary <br />The Service has placed increased em- <br />phasis on recovery planning. A pro- <br />cess has been developed to reduce the <br />backlog of species without recovery <br />plans. Target timeframes have been <br />established to guide the development <br />of draft and final plan preparation. <br />Both an overall trend towards recov- <br />ery and the time dimensions of that <br />trend have been evaluated. Species <br />listed longer appear to have a better <br />chance of becoming stable or <br />improving. <br />A commitment to endangered species <br />recovery is needed for a long time to <br />allow for noticeable results. Long- <br />term planning is needed to address <br />the program objectives. Though the <br />timeframe involved may be perceived <br />as long, recovery can and does hap- <br />pen. A serious commitment of both <br />personnel and money is important to <br />ensure the stabilization and recovery <br />of listed species, and the longterm <br />support of biodiversity. <br />Vii