My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7425
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7425
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:56 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 3:41:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7425
Author
Vandas, S. e. a.
Title
Dolores River Instream Flow Assessment
USFW Year
1990.
USFW - Doc Type
Project Report.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is <br />responsible for managing lands adjacent to the <br />Dolores River in southwestern Colorado. Resources <br />associated with this riverine ecosystem include <br />outdoor recreation, aquatic habitat, cultural resources, <br />and riparian vegetation. Many of the resource values <br />associated with the management of the river ecosys- <br />tem are dependent upon streamflow quantity. Since <br />the completion of McPhee Dam and Reservoir, <br />availability and quantity of instream flows to support <br />boating, aquatic and riparian habitat, and mainte- <br />nance of important stream channel and floodplain <br />physical and biological characteristics and processes <br />have not been determined. <br />BLM needs to know what flows are required to <br />support those resource values it is responsible for <br /> <br />managing. Furthermore, BLM needs to know what <br />alternatives are available to protect those instream <br />flows. Opportunities may be available for managing <br />water supplies for the benefit of both instream and <br />consumptive uses. <br />In 1975, the Interior and Agriculture Depart- <br />ments recommended "Wild and Scenic River" status <br />for much of the river, including roughly 94 miles of <br />the portion immediately downstream from Bradfield <br />Bridge. The Wilderness Study Area (WSA) portion <br />was recommended for "wild" status; other segments <br />were recommended for "scenic" and "recreational" <br />status. BLM (1989) continues to support these <br />recommendations. <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.