Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />BACKGRCUrn <br /> <br />The Fish and Wildlife service (FWS) is using the Instream Flow Incranental <br />Methodology (IFIM) as a tool for evaluating the habitat requiranents of the <br />endangered Coloraio River fishes in the upper Colorado River Basin (UCRB). <br />IFIM is a nn:lular system designed to simulate habitat as a function of stream- <br />flew (Bovee 1982, Milhous et al. 1984). SUitability Index (SI) curves, which <br />are an integral conponent of IFIM, are graphs that represent the relative <br />preferences and tolerances for variables (depth, veloci t:y, substrate, cover, <br />and tenperat:ure) that are important to the well-being of a species. several <br />techniques are available for developing SI curves (Bovee 1986); the method <br />utilized is often dependent on the quantity and qua,li ty of data available. <br /> <br />Data have been collected over the last several years to detennine the <br />habitat needs of the Colorado squawfish, hun'pback chub, and razorback sucker in <br />the UCRB. Much of these data w:!re used by FWSto develop SI curves in 1984 <br />(U.S. Fish and Wildlife service 1984). There was some concern, hcwever, that <br />data from other agencies and organizations \ere not included in the analysis <br />( only FWS data w:!re used), and that developnent of the curves was not well <br />documented. Also, there was not general agreement concerning data analysis and <br />curve developnent methods that w:!re utilized by FWS in the 1984 exercise. <br /> <br />The FWS had assanbled most of the kncMn habitat utilization data collected <br />l:7y state, federal, and private agencies/groups for the endang'ered fish of the <br />UCRB, and entered the data into a canplterized datal:ase. A need existed to <br />integrate missing data and analyze all data; develop SI curves for all vari- <br />ables, life stages, and species; identify data gaps and needs; and for species <br />eJCPSrts to evaluate the data and reach agreement on the best possible. curve <br />sets given the present kncwledge. A consensus by species elCpSrts was required <br />to detennine which data were suitable for analysis, hl:w curves were to be <br />developed, and when and where the UCRB curves are applicable. <br /> <br />PROJECT OBJECTIVES <br /> <br />The goal of this project is to generate the best possible SI (SUitability <br />Index) curves or criteria for depth, velocity, substrate, cover, and tanpera- <br />t:ure using the existing data and the professional judganent of species experts, <br />for all life stages of the Colorado squawfish, humptack chub, and razorback <br />sucker. The lxmytail chub was excluded from this analysis because of its <br />extreme rarity in the upper Basin and the absence of sufficient quantitative <br />data. To acconplish this goal, the follCMing objectives are to be met: <br /> <br />1 . Based on judgement of eJ.CP8rts, detennine which data wi thin the <br />canplterized data1:ase are suitable for quantitative analysis and use <br />in SI curve developnent, versus those which are only useful for <br />substantiating use of certain habitat variables and types. <br /> <br />1 <br />