My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7416
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7416
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:56 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 3:35:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7416
Author
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Title
Flaming Gorge Aspinall Joint Operations Study December, 15, 1988-Draft.
USFW Year
1988.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
UPDATING THE HOOVER DAM DOCUMENTS <br />As a result of negotiation, Section 601 of the House Committee approved bill contained a list of priorities to <br />govern the storage of water in storage units of the Colorado River Storage Project and releases of water from <br />Lake Powell. The priorites were: <br />(1) Releases in accordance with Article 111(c) of the Compact; <br />(2) Releases in accordance with Article 111(d); and <br />(3) Accumulation of storage in the Upper Basin not required for (1) and (2) and releases to meet uses spec- <br />ified Article l11(e). <br />Compromise language was agreed upon in Section 601(b) (3) which would direct the Secretary, in deter- <br />mining the quantity of storage in Lake Powell "reasonably necessary" pursuant to the Compact, to consider <br />all relevant factors, including, but not limited to, historic streamflows, the most critical period of record, and <br />probabilities of water supply. Use of the probability approach was favored by the Lower Basin interests over a <br />rigid rule curve proposed by the Upper Basin since, in the Lower Basin's opinion, the latter would require the <br />maintenance of progressively larger quantities of holdover storage in Lake Powell at the expense of storage in <br />Lake Mead as Upper Basin depletions increase, would limit the regulatory capability of Lake Powell, and <br />possibly result in excessive spills in Lake Powell with a resultant loss of power production (see Annual Report, <br />Colorado River Board of California, 1965-66, pages 11-13, and 29-30). This matter reemerged in the dis- <br />cussions preceding adoption of the Operating Criteria. <br />H.R.4671 discussed in 1966 did not leave the Rules Committee. The Pacific Northwest States opposed <br />the possibility of exporting Columbia River water. "Save the Grand Canyon" campaigns were publicized. Ad- <br />ministration support was lacking and Senate leaders wanted House approval before acting (see pages 41-46, <br />Eighteenth Annual Report of the Upper Colorado River Commission dated September 30, 1966). <br />However, the Colorado River Basin Project Act, which contained priority language in Section 602 similar <br />to that in H.R.4671, was signed by President Johnson on September 30, 1968 (see Appendix 1202 for text <br />of Act). <br />B. Colorado River Basin Project Act - Section 602(a) <br />Section 602(a) of the Colorado River Basin Project Act dated September 30, 1968, 82 Stat. 900 (Public <br />Law 90-537), required the Secretary of the Interior to propose "criteria for the coordinated long-range opera- <br />tion of the reservoirs constructed and operated under the authority of the Colorado River Storage Project <br />Act, the Boulder Canyon Project Act, and the Boulder Canyon Project Adjustment Act." Section 602(a) fur- <br />ther stated that the criteria make provision for the storage of water in the Upper Basin storage units and <br />releases of water from Lake Powell in a listed order of priorities stated below. Section 602(b) directed that not <br />later than January 1, 1970, the proposed criteria be submitted to the Governors of the seven Basin States <br />and other interested parties for review and comment and that the Secretary adopt appropriate criteria not <br />later than July 1, 1970. The text of Section 602(a) and the above-mentioned order of priorities follows: <br />"Sec. 602(a) In order to comply with and carry out the provisions of the Colorado River Compact, the <br />Upper Colorado River Basin Compact, and the Mexican Water Treaty, the Secretary shall propose criteria <br />for the coordinated long-range operation of the reservoirs constructed and operated under the authority of <br />the Colorado River Storage Project Act, the Boulder Canyon Project Act, and the Boulder Canyon Project <br />Adjustment Act. To effect in part the purposes expressed in this paragraph, the criteria shall make provi- <br />slon for the storage of water in storage units of the Colorado River Storage Project and releases of water <br />from Lake Powell in the following listed order of priority: <br />(1) Releases to supply one-half the deficiency described in Article 111(c) of the Colorado River Com- <br />pact, 9 any such deficiency exists and is chargeable to the States of the Upper Division, but in any event <br />such releases, if any, shall not be required in any year that the Secretary makes the determination and <br />Issues the proclamation specified in Section 202 of this Act; <br />(2) Releases to comply with Article III(d) of the Colorado River Compact, less such quantities of water <br />delivered into the Colorado River below Lee Ferry to the credit of the States of the Upper Division from <br />other sources; and <br />(3) Storage of water not required for the releases specified in clauses (1) and (2) of this subsection to <br />the extent that the Secretary, after consultation with the Upper Colorado River Commission and repre- <br />sentatives of the three Lower Division States and taking into consideration all relevant factors (including, <br />A-2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.