Laserfiche WebLink
Based upon these measurements, the <br />and Ouray Refuge were extended, and <br />was prepared for Tia Juana Bottom. <br />the ratings tables for the three si <br />1-3 and Figures 3-5, and the rating <br />the sites is displayed below. <br />Mitten Park <br />X=y-83.6096095/.00086404 <br />Ouray Refuge <br />X=Y-1.353397/.583378 <br />Tia Juana Bottom <br />X=Y-41.92915640/0003372 <br />Where X= Flow and Y= Stage <br />V. SSARR MODEL CALIBRATION <br />Flaming Gorge to Jensen <br />rating tables at Mitten Park <br />a preliminary rating table <br />The stage vs flow graphs and <br />tes are displayed in Tables <br />table equation for each of <br />In the late 1970's, a proposal by the Bureau to increase the. <br />peaking capability of Flaming Gorge powerplant was investigated <br />as a means to generate greater power revenues. Although the plan <br />was ultimately dropped, the proposed increasein discharge <br />fluctuations led to the calibration of the SSARR river routing <br />computer model, which could predict the downstream effect of any <br />hourly release from the dam. <br />In 1978, Reclamation installed recording stream gages at Little <br />Hole, Browns Park, and at the Gates of Lodore. These were used <br />in conjunction with the Greendale gage, a permanent USGS gage <br />site just downstream of the dam. The dam releases were recorded <br />for a 2 week period of fluctuating flow using Stevens A-35 <br />recorders. Cross sections were surveyed and rating tables were <br />developed for each of the sites. The strip charts were then <br />converted to flow hydrographs. <br />An examination of the hydrographs indicated very little <br />attenuation in the reach from the dam down to Browns Park. Much <br />of this channel is canyon terrain and confined. Therefore, the <br />calibrated model only shifted the dam release in time. The <br />Browns Park area, however, has a flattened gradient and a wider <br />channel cross section with a greater degree of meandering. <br />6