Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ALTERNATIVE <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />NPS <br /> <br />2 <br />NPS <br /> <br />3 <br />BlM <br />OPTION A <br />(GGSRMA) <br /> <br />OPTION B <br />(GGNCA) <br /> <br />MANAGEMENT DIFFERENCES <br /> <br />SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACTS <br /> <br />Eventual phase out of grazing could have an adverse impact <br />on individual permittees. Any economic benefits of sport <br />hunting would be adversely impacted by its elimination. <br />These adverse impacts would be offset at least partially, if not <br />fully, by increased attraction to the area due to traditional <br />name recognition of NPS area. Watchable wildlife <br />opportunities would at least partially offset any adverse impact <br />of hunting closure. <br /> <br />Same as Alternative 1. <br /> <br />No economic impact on current uses p.e., grazing, hunting, <br />etc.). An effective marketing program could increase visitation <br />and result in economic benefits to community. <br /> <br />Same as Alternative 3, Option A. <br /> <br />LAW ENFORCEMENT / <br />SEARCH & RESCUE <br /> <br />NPS maintains round-the-clock law enforcement and search <br />and rescue capability. Maintains EMS capability. ConcUrrent <br />jurisdiction enables NPS to enforce broad spectrum of both <br />State and Federal laws. <br /> <br />Same as Alternative 1. <br /> <br />Maintains limited law enforcement and relies on County <br />Sheriff for search and rescue and EMS. Proprietary <br />jurisdiction limits BlM to enforcement of resource-rlllated <br />Federal regulations. ' <br /> <br />Additional full-time ranger on duty. Proprietary jurisdiction <br />limits BlM to enforcement of resource-related Federal <br />regulations. <br />