My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7385
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7385
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:56 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 3:32:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7385
Author
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Title
Two Forks Reservoir & William's Fork Gravity Collection System Projects Colorado.
USFW Year
1987.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
191
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />1 Colonel Steven G. West <br />Two Forks <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br />L? <br /> <br />2 <br />The major adverse impact of the Two Forks project on aquatic resources is the <br />inundation loss of 32.1 miles of the South Platte River and North Fork of the <br />South Platte River. This inundation loss includes all but 1.1 miles of the <br />Cheesman to Scraggy View reach of the South Platte River which has been <br />designated as Resource Category 1 by the Service. Measured in terms of biomass, <br />the net loss of trout stream habitat would be 36,500 pounds. <br />Major terrestrial wildlife impacts are the loss of 9,315 acres of mule deer <br />winter range, 477 acres of elk winter range, 25 acres of lambing, 39 acres of <br />migration corridor, 154 acres of overall range, 403 acres of historic range for <br />bighorn sheep, 865 acres of turkey habitat, and 298.5 acres of wetlands. <br />Impacts on the Platte River in Nebraska were determined to be insignificant for <br />nonlisted species from Two Forks; however, cumulative impacts from the many <br />projects being planned (Narrows, Prairie Bend, Senac, Corn Creek, Deer Creek, <br />Seminoe Enlargement, Cache La Poudre, Frenchman Creek, Catherland, and Enders) <br />would be very significant with streamflow losses in Nebraska of 21-28 percent or <br />more. <br />We have worked closely with the Division, Commission, Forest Service, Corps of <br />Engineers, Environmental Protection Agency, and the Water Department to <br />determine appropriate mitigation measures to offset the adverse impacts of Two <br />Forks, should Federal permits be issued for the project. The major mitigation <br />elements described in this report and recommended for inclusion in any Federal <br />permits authorizing project development are as follows: <br />1. A Mitigation Team be established with a Core Team comprised of the Forest <br />' Service, Corps, Service, Environmental Protection Agency, Division, and <br />Water Department, and an Implementation Team comprised of the Water <br />Department and the Division. <br />' 2. Aquatic mitigation recommendations include: <br />a. Improving trout stream habitat through flow and watershed management on <br />the South Platte, Blue, Williams Fork, and Fraser Rivers. Mitigation on <br />these streams is expected to result in biomass gains of 25,000-31,500 <br />pounds or 68-86 percent of the biomass lost. The Division has requested <br />' a guarantee of instream biomass gains to equal or exceed 90 percent of <br />the net losses from Two Forks. <br />b. Establishment of a trust fund agreement between the Water Department and <br />the Division to transfer 10 million dollars from the Water Department to <br />the Division. This trust fund would be used for stream watershed <br />improvements and stocking of Two Forks. <br /> <br />1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.