Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, , <br /> <br />apply to USSR projects. Instead, USBR agreed to hold water in its reservoirs <br />for later release to habitats occupied by endangered fishes. <br />The Windy Gap Process provea to very controversial for the USFWS. In <br />testimony be--fore~ Congress,~ several environmental organizations alleged- the <br />process entailed "excessive and unnecessary risks of extinction for these <br />speciesll (Environmental Defense Fund et.M. 1985). The USFWS discontinued <br />the Windy Gap Process on large water development projects after 1985 and <br />formed an interagency Coordinating Committee to assist in developing a <br />Section 7 consultation proc?ss that was acceptable to both environmental and <br />water development interests. <br /> <br />Early Studies <br /> <br />Early detailed investigations of the biota of the upper Colorado River <br />basin were directed toward pre- and post-impoundment studies to answer <br />questions about water quality (Sigler et ~. .1966; Tsivoglov et ~. 1959) and <br />the probable effects of future alterations in water quality and streamflow on <br />gamefish (Powell 1958; Weber 1959; Coon 1965). <br />In March 1963, Secretary of the Interior Stewart Udall requested the Utah <br />Cooperative Fishery Research Unit to investigate changes in habitat and fish <br />populations of the Green River in DNM, Colorado-Utah, resulting from the 1962 <br />poisoning operation and closure of Flaming Gorge Dam. In 1963-1966, these <br />studies concluded that cold water releases caused the disappearance of the <br />Colorado squawfish, bony tail, humpback chub, and razorback sucker from the <br />105-km reach below the dam (Vanicek 1967; Vanicek et ~. 1970). However, <br />these studies also found that the Green River below its confluence with the <br />Yampa River still contained the endangered Colorado River fishes, a presumed <br />