Laserfiche WebLink
<br />TAXONOMY <br />DIST] NGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS: <br />Characteristics which most typify G. cypha are; <br />1. An abrupt nuchal hump in the occiput region. <br />2. A fleshy snout projecting well beyond the jaw <br />with subterminal mouth. <br />3. The caudal peduncle thickness and upper jaw length <br />intermediate between the three species. <br />ti- <br />4. A significantly smaller eye diameter of 6.0-7.1, mm. <br />The more pronounced the nuchal hump and the more closely <br />specimens resemble key characteristics, the purer the species. <br />We must continually keep in mind that distinction between 17, ry-ha <br />and G. elegans is not clear due to introg?ressive ryrridi:.at: m. <br />However, it is generally agreed that the two species, G. cyrha, <br />and G. elerans, are two valid species (personal conversat.ior with <br />Dr. Behnke). G. cypha perhaps evolved from G. elerAns a' n earlier <br />time, became isolated by past environmental- conditions, and a6apt.ed <br />to torrential canyon areas of the Colorado River. More recently, <br />because of changing habitat and reduced numbers, hybridization has <br />taken place. <br />SPK17*1,1S' TAXONO:?IC CHARACTERISTICS: <br />Of the four key characters, our specimen qualifies as Gila <br />cypha on all measurements and characteristics (see Tab.1) ;,s <br />noted in Table I, snout length was of some concern. As shown in. <br />photograph, Figure 3 (page 7), the snout is somewhat shcrter and <br />head depth in posterior region was thicker iiu?ltoe specimer-,., figures <br />I and II. Specimen's abrupt hump could be considered intermediate <br />between two top specimens in Figure IT. <br />r