Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />3-5 <br /> <br />Inslee (1983) reported the fecundity in 18 eight year old females of <br />38,559 to 83,579 eggs per female for a mean of 60,676 eggs. The number of <br />eggs per pound ranged from 18,372 to 43,137 for a mean of 31,094. <br /> <br />3.2 Humpback Chub <br />3.2.1 Brief History <br /> <br />Humpback chub were fi rst subjected to a "spawni ng tri a 1" at Wi 11 ow <br />Beach NFH in 1980. The brood stock consisted ot~.14<wH& adu-ltsfnlllt"tflle'"> ' <br />Little Colorado River (LCR)" and 16 wild aduTts'froflrtheUp,per Colorado Rl'er } 4./Y'2J /) <br />(Hamman 1982a). Fish from the LCR were collected May 17, 1978; October 17, - ~-" <br />1979; and June 13, 1980 near the confluence of the Colorado River in Grand <br />Canyon National Park, Arizona. The Colorado River fish were collected <br />November 5, 1979 at Black Rocks, below Grand Junction, Colorado. This first <br />attempt produced about 18,000 eggs and 6,500 fingerlings {Table 2). <br /> <br />In 1981, the previously mentioned brood stock produced about 50,000 <br />eggs and 36,321 swim-up fry (23,940 naturally spawned and 12,381 <br />artificially spawned). These produced 19,957 and 9,318 fingerlings, <br />respectively, for a total of 29,175 (Hamman 1982a). Survival from fry to <br />fingerl ings was 83 and 75% for naturally and artificially-spawned eggs, <br />respectively. In addition to the fish produced at Willow Beach NFH, about <br />18,000 eggs were taken from wild fish in a field spawning trial at Black <br />Rocks, Colorado on June 2, 1981 (Valdez and Clemmer 1982). <br /> <br />In 1981, the 30 wild adults and their progeny were transferred from <br />Willow Beach NFH to Dexter NFH, where refinements in hatchery methodologies <br />continued with an emphasis on examining the taxonomic problems associated <br />with the Gila complex (Hamman 1981a). This program has consisted of induced <br />hybridizat:iOil between humpback chub, roundtail chub and bony tail. The <br />progeny of these crosses were SUbjected to caryotyping (chromosome mapping), <br />electrophoresis (blood protein separation), and morphometric analyses to <br />determine the characteristics of wild hybrids from their domestic <br />counterparts and to facilitate distinctions between species intergrades <br />afield. No pure humpback chub were produced in the hatchery in 1982, 1983 <br />or 1984. An additional 54 juveniles were transferred to Dexter NFH from the <br />Little Colorado River in August 1984. <br /> <br />3.2.2 Releases To The Wild '-) <br /> <br />Hatchery-reared ~umpback chub have been re1 eased in the wi 1 d only onc~ .} <br />A~p~, 7~QO hUllpb.ch, 15'"150"" TL, w,,"" r.l"_~1n~""'''1'9lltfn ____ :::;- <br />c.Wfoact Canyon, a whi tewater secti on of the Upper C fora-era' River "; / <br />immediately upstream from Lake Powell, Utah. All fish re marked with / <br />coded wire nose tags at Willow Beach NFH before transfer/and release. No ~ <br />subsequent attempts have been made to recapture these fish.\ The approximate/ <br />distribution of hatchery-reared humpback chub is presented/in Table 2. I. <br />I <br /> <br />/ <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />'- <br />